Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The idea of 'reflectors' is perhaps the wrong approach, I prefer the term
deflectors as one sees when rays hit a knife edge. Also close coupling enables elements to be current heavy and others voltage heavy such that it would appear that a element was doing nothing when in fact it is the link for more current loaded elements in cluster form. A wall that you suggest can indeed reflect and absorb radio waves but a wall is beyond my means thus resonance remains a important function of change. But then close coupling of elements together with the deflection aproach has been dissed many times over the years with me and always ends in derision of the author Time will tell but experimentation can be enjoyable especially when a trail of past results suggests that my rubicon is at hand and close to submission to RADCOM where experimentation is still valued. Heh, no politics here or religeon so all can join in without fear especially those who are willing to consider and pursue 'outside of the box' ideas that others distain., in order to gain better understanding Regards Art "Buck" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:10:00 GMT, " wrote: Roy allow me to be a bit more directive regarding my pursuit. I am trying to see what methods that can be used for maximum gain. Having made many a long boom yagi 80 feet and 13 elements I have come to the cinclusion that thinking must move away from Yagi's. If one starts with a balloon squeezed in the center we get the figure 8 pattern. I think we all can agree on that My logic is that we must find a way to move all the volume at the rear to the front thus increasing the front diameter before we begin to massage it. The present thinking is one sqeeze at the rear is the best that one can do. It is here that I part company with the norm. If we move all the volume to the front then talk of gain/boom length becomes moot. This sounds like a place for the horn antenna similar to what we use in microwave communications. You have an interesting approach. I am sure you have considered this, but how well do the multiple reflectors work with the yagi? not so much those in line with the elements as those that form a wall behind the driven element or the first reflector. If you look at current flow in a corner reflector antenna you will note that rear elements individually carry little current! Food for thought Art Buck -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FT817 front vs. rear connector | Equipment | |||
FT817 front vs. rear connector | Equipment | |||
FT817 front vs. rear connector | Equipment | |||
[OT] Smear campaign against John Kerry | Boatanchors | |||
BC155 rear port | Scanner |