Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Martes" bravely wrote to "All" (06 Mar 05 23:31:40)
--- on the heady topic of " Circular Parasitic" JM From: "Jerry Martes" JM Xref: aeinews rec.radio.amateur.antenna:26527 JM Do you have an actual application for this circularly polarized JM directional UHF antenna with the "loop" included? Just curious about the UHF loop antenna as it is said to have a gain of +1dB in the vertical position and -3dB in the horizontal position. JM A simple "Turnstile" will give good CP. The satellite guys use them JM with reflectors. IIRC satellite folk use double or quad counter-rotating wire corkscrews sticking out of a reflector don't they? A turnstile seems pretty much omnidirectional but doesn't it need to be phased somehow? JM I can give some information about simple crossed dipole antennas JM that give pretty good CP recpiton at VHF. This would be the same phasing techniques as with the turnstile? I've seen a large 6 element array near my area and that impressed me but I think the neighbours would be forming a posse if they saw one here. BTW I made a portable antenna for low vhf using a 3/4 in. dia. plastic curtain rod as a long coil form. The conductor is wound around the 6 ft long plastic rod with about 1/4 inch spacing. It works okay but it is quite sensitive to proximity effects due to the spread inductance and the 200pF cap used to series resonnate it. It is far shorter than the wavelengths it receives but does the job. It isn't classy. A*s*i*m*o*v .... CAUTION: I drive just like you do! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Asimov" wrote in message ... "Jerry Martes" bravely wrote to "All" (06 Mar 05 23:31:40) --- on the heady topic of " Circular Parasitic" JM From: "Jerry Martes" JM Xref: aeinews rec.radio.amateur.antenna:26527 JM Do you have an actual application for this circularly polarized JM directional UHF antenna with the "loop" included? Just curious about the UHF loop antenna as it is said to have a gain of +1dB in the vertical position and -3dB in the horizontal position. JM A simple "Turnstile" will give good CP. The satellite guys use them JM with reflectors. IIRC satellite folk use double or quad counter-rotating wire corkscrews sticking out of a reflector don't they? A turnstile seems pretty much omnidirectional but doesn't it need to be phased somehow? JM I can give some information about simple crossed dipole antennas JM that give pretty good CP recpiton at VHF. This would be the same phasing techniques as with the turnstile? I've seen a large 6 element array near my area and that impressed me but I think the neighbours would be forming a posse if they saw one here. BTW I made a portable antenna for low vhf using a 3/4 in. dia. plastic curtain rod as a long coil form. The conductor is wound around the 6 ft long plastic rod with about 1/4 inch spacing. It works okay but it is quite sensitive to proximity effects due to the spread inductance and the 200pF cap used to series resonnate it. It is far shorter than the wavelengths it receives but does the job. It isn't classy. A*s*i*m*o*v Asimov At first I was thinking that you were curious about building a UHF antenna with a loop as the driven element then try to include some parasitic dipoles to produce some directivity. I couldnt offer any thoughts on that. But, when you mentioned circular polarization and directivity, I wondered why you wouldnt consider a helix for UHF. On loopgain -- I wouldnt want to argue about the gain of a loop being anything above or below that of a dipole. I would expect a loop to have very nearly the same gain (directivity) as the dipole. I even thought that small loops have exactly the same pattern shape as a short dipole. That would make their gain the same if their efficiency is good. On turnstile -- The turnstile is two crossed dipoles in the same plane fed 90 degrees out of phase. It produces RHCP in one direction and LHCP in the other direction. The antenna I use is two crossed dipoles spaced 1/4 wave apart and fed in phase. That gives good RHCP (or LHCP, whichever you want) toward both directions. Jerry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:29:20 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Asimov" wrote in message .. . "Jerry Martes" bravely wrote to "All" (06 Mar 05 23:31:40) --- on the heady topic of " Circular Parasitic" JM From: "Jerry Martes" JM Xref: aeinews rec.radio.amateur.antenna:26527 JM Do you have an actual application for this circularly polarized JM directional UHF antenna with the "loop" included? Just curious about the UHF loop antenna as it is said to have a gain of +1dB in the vertical position and -3dB in the horizontal position. JM A simple "Turnstile" will give good CP. The satellite guys use them JM with reflectors. IIRC satellite folk use double or quad counter-rotating wire corkscrews sticking out of a reflector don't they? A turnstile seems pretty much omnidirectional but doesn't it need to be phased somehow? JM I can give some information about simple crossed dipole antennas JM that give pretty good CP recpiton at VHF. This would be the same phasing techniques as with the turnstile? I've seen a large 6 element array near my area and that impressed me but I think the neighbours would be forming a posse if they saw one here. BTW I made a portable antenna for low vhf using a 3/4 in. dia. plastic curtain rod as a long coil form. The conductor is wound around the 6 ft long plastic rod with about 1/4 inch spacing. It works okay but it is quite sensitive to proximity effects due to the spread inductance and the 200pF cap used to series resonnate it. It is far shorter than the wavelengths it receives but does the job. It isn't classy. A*s*i*m*o*v Asimov At first I was thinking that you were curious about building a UHF antenna with a loop as the driven element then try to include some parasitic dipoles to produce some directivity. I couldnt offer any thoughts on that. But, when you mentioned circular polarization and directivity, I wondered why you wouldnt consider a helix for UHF. On loopgain -- I wouldnt want to argue about the gain of a loop being anything above or below that of a dipole. I would expect a loop to have very nearly the same gain (directivity) as the dipole. I even thought that small loops have exactly the same pattern shape as a short dipole. That would make their gain the same if their efficiency is good. On turnstile -- The turnstile is two crossed dipoles in the same plane fed 90 degrees out of phase. It produces RHCP in one direction and LHCP in the other direction. The antenna I use is two crossed dipoles spaced 1/4 wave apart and fed in phase. That gives good RHCP (or LHCP, whichever you want) toward both directions. Jerry Time travel? What, do you have a TARDIS? Or a vortex manipulator? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JM Do you have an actual application for this circularly
polarized directional UHF antenna with the "loop" included? A*s*i*m*o*v Just curious about the UHF loop antenna as it is said to have a gain of +1dB in the vertical position and -3dB in the horizontal position. ________________ A planar, circular loop of diameter ~0.1 lambda is linearly polarized, with peak gain* in the plane of the loop. This loop will have vertical polarization when in the vertical position, and horizontal polarization when in the horizontal position. Lacking ~equal h-pol & v-pol gain at the same time, such a loop is not circularly polarized -- even though the physical configuration of the loop is a circle. *theoretically about 1.74dBi (far field, free space) RF |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Do you know the approximate input impedance of a 0.1 lambda diameter single turn loop? Jerry "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... JM Do you have an actual application for this circularly polarized directional UHF antenna with the "loop" included? A*s*i*m*o*v Just curious about the UHF loop antenna as it is said to have a gain of +1dB in the vertical position and -3dB in the horizontal position. ________________ A planar, circular loop of diameter ~0.1 lambda is linearly polarized, with peak gain* in the plane of the loop. This loop will have vertical polarization when in the vertical position, and horizontal polarization when in the horizontal position. Lacking ~equal h-pol & v-pol gain at the same time, such a loop is not circularly polarized -- even though the physical configuration of the loop is a circle. *theoretically about 1.74dBi (far field, free space) RF |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Martes"
Do you know the approximate input impedance of a 0.1 lambda diameter single turn loop? __________ About 2.5 ohms. RF |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... "Jerry Martes" Do you know the approximate input impedance of a 0.1 lambda diameter single turn loop? __________ About 2.5 ohms. RF Richard Can you guide me to a web site where that loop input impedance is given in R+jX? I will set up and measure some loop input impedance at 137 MHz within the next few days. But, I'd like to have a better "feel" for what I'm doing before I take time to build the loop and set up the test equipment. Thanks Jerry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Martes"
Can you guide me to a web site where that loop input impedance is given in R+jX? _____________ I don't know of one off-hand. Maybe Google, or you could download free EZNEC to experiment with. If it will do, a quick NEC-2 model of a ~0.1 lambda diameter loop I just did shows 2.20831E+0, -1.31989E+03. This R is a little lower than the first number I posted -- which I had looked up in Kraus, 3rd edition. RF |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
"This R is a little lower than the first number I posted--which I looked up in Kraus, 3rd edition." An excellent source for everything about antennas, I think. I chose Arnold B. Bailey who has a special affinity for loops, I think. In "TV and Other Receiving Antennas" on page 403 Bailey says: "The small loop has a very low resistance (not much over 0.5 ohm for a circumference of 0.25 wavelength) and a very high positive Q indicating inductive reactance. The Q will depend on the thickness of the cross section of the conductor (P factor, as previously used for rod antennas). For 200-Mc balanced circular loops, where L=0.25 wavelength (coil diameter=0.25 wavelength/pi), the following Q`s are representative: 1. For 1-inch diameter rods, QA = 175 2. For 1/4-inch diameter rods, QA = 280 3. For No. 10 wire, QA = 400." Bandwidth is about equal to 2/QA. Q is about X/R, or X is about RQ. The loop radiation resistance of 0.5 ohm is so small that loss resistance likely may affect the actual loop resistance total. I`ll leave the reactance (RQ) for the user to calculate for whatever frequency and Q may interest him. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:13:14 GMT, "Jerry Martes"
wrote: "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... "Jerry Martes" Do you know the approximate input impedance of a 0.1 lambda diameter single turn loop? __________ About 2.5 ohms. RF Richard Can you guide me to a web site where that loop input impedance is given in R+jX? I will set up and measure some loop input impedance at 137 MHz within the next few days. But, I'd like to have a better "feel" for what I'm doing before I take time to build the loop and set up the test equipment. Thanks Jerry Hi Jerry, The free version of EZNEC should cope with this simple problem. To answer your question it reveals: Impedance = 4.887 + J 853 ohms 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB - 2 Watt carbon Resistors for Parasitic Chokes | Swap | |||
circular radiation! | Antenna | |||
program to make a circular tuning scale? | Shortwave | |||
PHASING HARNESS FOR 2 BAY CIRCULAR POLARIZED ANTENNA????? | Antenna | |||
Parasitic question | Antenna |