Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aaaahhhhhhh, another speculator who can't resist fouling a good thread and
wasting bandwidth in these groups. You and the other guy know nothing and feel the need to prove it here for some reason. Now that you've done that please run along. There are people checking this thread for information and all they find is your uninformative crap. You have nothing to add so please go back to posting in your porn NG's or whatever it is you like to do. And while your posting in alt.whack.whack.whack consider this - not everyone of these units goes out the "front door" - people get them as evaluation units and they may get them before the readers of alt.whack.whack.whack such as yourself get them. If no one has any information on it - thats OK too - I'm not worried. Now seriously ... GO AWAY. "Bob Miller" speculated that : blah, blah, blah |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:03:01 -0500, "Ed" wrote:
Now seriously ... GO AWAY. You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation. Bob k5qwg |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
feel better now ? good
now please go away. you have nothing to contribute and have proved it several times now. "Bob Miller" wasted more bandwidth in a personal attack ... You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation. Bob k5qwg |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation.
Bob, this guy is obviously a mental case, and there is nothing to be gained getting our blood pressure up trying to reason with him. I am not. 73 Gary N4AST |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Go back and read the posts. The jerk comment belongs to "Bob" so you
apparently believe that Bob is a mental case. How about if the both of you go insult each other elsewhere and leave the thread alone so the many folks following the thread will eventually get some good information on this tuner and not have to read through all of your nonsense ? Please. Ed "JGBOYLES" wrote in message ... You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation. Bob, this guy is obviously a mental case, and there is nothing to be gained getting our blood pressure up trying to reason with him. I am not. 73 Gary N4AST |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's to follow.. You asked about a product not released yet, people
informed you (whether you knew yet or not) that it wasn't released yet, then you proceeded to act the ass and tell them they're speculating (even though they were attempting to not speculate on the product). Seems fairly easy to follow to me. And besides, there's still no information on said tuner. Seems to me you posted this thread as trollbait, because you're one of those twisted individuals who gets his rocks off calling people names and holding the "high" ground. Go lay down by your bowl. -SSB Ed wrote: Go back and read the posts. The jerk comment belongs to "Bob" so you apparently believe that Bob is a mental case. How about if the both of you go insult each other elsewhere and leave the thread alone so the many folks following the thread will eventually get some good information on this tuner and not have to read through all of your nonsense ? Please. Ed "JGBOYLES" wrote in message ... You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation. Bob, this guy is obviously a mental case, and there is nothing to be gained getting our blood pressure up trying to reason with him. I am not. 73 Gary N4AST |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is this really great feature in Outlook (not Express). When plonk
someone, it removes all traces of him from the thread. Bob, plonk this guy. You are arguing with an idiot. "Bob Miller" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:03:01 -0500, "Ed" wrote: Now seriously ... GO AWAY. You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation. Bob k5qwg |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
plonk.
"Ed" wrote in message ... Aaaahhhhhhh, another speculator who can't resist fouling a good thread and wasting bandwidth in these groups. You and the other guy know nothing and feel the need to prove it here for some reason. Now that you've done that please run along. There are people checking this thread for information and all they find is your uninformative crap. You have nothing to add so please go back to posting in your porn NG's or whatever it is you like to do. And while your posting in alt.whack.whack.whack consider this - not everyone of these units goes out the "front door" - people get them as evaluation units and they may get them before the readers of alt.whack.whack.whack such as yourself get them. If no one has any information on it - thats OK too - I'm not worried. Now seriously ... GO AWAY. "Bob Miller" speculated that : blah, blah, blah |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed" wrote:
Aaaahhhhhhh, another speculator who can't resist fouling a good thread and wasting bandwidth in these groups. You and the other guy know nothing and feel the need to prove it here for some reason. Now that you've done that please run along. There are people checking this thread for information and all they find is your uninformative crap. You have nothing to add so please go back to posting in your porn NG's or whatever it is you like to do. And while your posting in alt.whack.whack.whack consider this - not everyone of these units goes out the "front door" - people get them as evaluation units and they may get them before the readers of alt.whack.whack.whack such as yourself get them. If no one has any information on it - thats OK too - I'm not worried. Now seriously ... GO AWAY. "Bob Miller" speculated that : blah, blah, blah I'm thinking of buying a 2005 Camry for my daughter when she graduates next year. Any one out there have any actual hands on experience on that vehicle. Sheez |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Budman wrote:
SNIP I'm thinking of buying a 2005 Camry for my daughter when she graduates next year. Any one out there have any actual hands on experience on that vehicle. Sheez YES!! The test engineers for Camry drove it about 1 year ago! It was part of the design and development cycle. Does that mean that someone from MFJ may have tested the new tuner?? I would guess so. But, [s]he may not be at liberty to make a public comment. Anyway this thread begs the issue. Deacon Dave |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balanced Tuner for Balanced Antennas? | Antenna | |||
Adjustment of simple balanced tuner | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |