Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Ian, I apologize if my humor offended you. It wasn't the "humor" (which was too feeble to offend anyone) but your talent for turning any technical discussion into a total waste of time. Imaginary circuits impossible to achieve in reality are not a waste of time? What is the agenda for diverting the discussion away from reality to something that cannot possibly exist in reality? I may be wrong, but it seems to me that agenda simply seeks to avoid the truths that will be uncovered by limiting the discussion to things that are possible. Since lumped inductors are impossible to achieve in reality, one might assert that they can sit up and spit cider in your eye. (From an old Dean Martin movie) How could you ever prove otherwise since the assertion cannot be tested? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |