Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:38:49 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote: Terman also says nothing about a Helical wound slim jim. Of course, this begs the question "Why would he?" The results are predictable, boringly so, and several have already been down that road to no net gain. However, common sense in these matters can be discarded if only someone offers validation, however slim that may be from any jim. Such inventors stand on the shoulders of dwarfs. Sorry for the allusion, as it again reprises the obvious that physical height in relation to a standard (wavelength) dominates the principle. However as principles and seeking validation go, no doubt the topic will drift towards top loading dwarfs.... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vintage 78 RPM Blues Collection For Sale / Robert Johnson; Elmore James; Blind Boy Fuller; Blind Lemon Jefferson; Bessie Smith; Muddy Waters | Swap | |||
Helical Resonators?? | Swap | |||
Helical Resonators | General | |||
Horizontal J type (G2BCX Slim Jim for those who remember) | Antenna | |||
Helical Stub Antenna | Antenna |