Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:09:27 GMT, "
wrote:


Just making a point


Hi Art,

You could use a blunt.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard, I'm guessing that you have no idea what you said in
semi-current slang.

tom
K0TAR

Tom, I am just guessing, but are you referring to medicinal marijuanna?
grin

Regards

--
Hay, if'n ya'll cun't konstructivly partecipete in this har disscusion, haw
aboot speel-checkin it fer me?


"Tom Ring" wrote in message
.. .
Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:09:27 GMT, "
wrote:


Just making a point


Hi Art,

You could use a blunt. 73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard, I'm guessing that you have no idea what you said in semi-current
slang.

tom
K0TAR

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:31:13 -0600, Tom Ring
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:09:27 GMT, "
wrote:


Just making a point


Hi Art,

You could use a blunt.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard, I'm guessing that you have no idea what you said in
semi-current slang.

Hi Tom,

Guessing and supposing seem to be de Rigueur. Let's look at it
through deconstruction (the convolutions of language used here are to
thin out the shallow end of the grammatical pool) and let me ask:
"Considering your reaction, Art's stimulus by which I made my
suggestion, and the comment itself: does all this maintain a
consistent, internal logic?"

If I were to deconstruct further, I would offer the query:
"How current is semi?"

If we reach back beyond the currency of semi (say 3 or more decades);
then I would have offered Art:
"Keep a tight ass hole."
and it would have still come from the same culture.

Now, at the risk of having to "explain" to a generation that demands
facts and references, and then shows so little inclination to actually
apply them (this does not mean you by the way as you have been
adventurous enough to probably have made connections anyway); then my
short answer would be:
"You've guessed wrong." (which is a far more commonplace outcome
by virtue of this preponderance of guessing, presuming, and supposing
instead of testing, analyzing, and examining).

5 points to the one who can name the source to the ancient (nearly 40
year old) quote offered. 5 extra points if you can provide the
context (fictional character) who employs it. And 10 points bonus if
you can name (fictional character) who it is applied to.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark"
5 points to the one who can name the source to the ancient (nearly
40 year old) quote offered. 5 extra points if you can provide the
context (fictional character) who employs it. And 10 points bonus if
you can name (fictional character) who it is applied to.
__________________

Using scientific texts and methods rather than a thesaurus and fictional
references to try to make your points here would serve you (and the rest of
us) better.

Or you might wish to move to alt.english.usage, and see if those folks are
impressed.

RF

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:43:34 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote:

Or you might wish to move to alt.english.usage, and see if those folks are
impressed.

Hi OM,

It's satisfying enough to see you're stunned. ;-)
That was the point of the sieve.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote
It's satisfying enough to see you're stunned. ;-)
That was the point of the sieve.
__________________

Your perception of that is as inaccurate as the one you espouse about loaded
verticals. Are you incapable of dealing with technical topics in a
technical manner?

I suppose now you'll claim that your post above was another sieve, and
congratulate yourself all over again.

RF

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:52:24 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote:

Are you incapable of dealing with technical topics in a
technical manner?

Hi OM,

I respond to all correspondence of interest. I see you enjoy talk
about talking about technical topics, but I have seen no technical
discussion from you for quite some time. That is your sole
responsibility as no one can do your typing for you.

I suppose now

Yes, but too often.

This is what I mean about choice and responsibility. You chose to
ramble on instead of offering technical discussion. I am equally
pleased to travel either path, and I suspect your protestation above
given the inclination obviously revealed below it.

So to match your diverging interests, can you answer
"What does Do Wa Diddy mean?"

If your heart of heart's desire for technical topics must be sated
first
What effect would surface phonon polaritons present to an
antenna's efficiency?

Either constitute another sieve. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote:

Drivel not worth serious consideration.

Richard Clark wrote:


If I were to deconstruct further, I would offer the query:
"How current is semi?"

1 decade.


If we reach back beyond the currency of semi (say 3 or more decades);
then I would have offered Art:
"Keep a tight ass hole."
and it would have still come from the same culture.

Now, at the risk of having to "explain" to a generation that demands
facts and references, and then shows so little inclination to actually
apply them (this does not mean you by the way as you have been
adventurous enough to probably have made connections anyway); then my
short answer would be:
"You've guessed wrong." (which is a far more commonplace outcome
by virtue of this preponderance of guessing, presuming, and supposing
instead of testing, analyzing, and examining).

5 points to the one who can name the source to the ancient (nearly 40
year old) quote offered. 5 extra points if you can provide the
context (fictional character) who employs it. And 10 points bonus if
you can name (fictional character) who it is applied to.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Hmm, I'd say about 61 years +-1 on the quote, and I couldn't guess who
used it 40 years ago.

And blunt is now a drug reference if you haven't kept up.

So who was it that recycled the combat advice?

tom
K0TAR

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:09:17 -0600, Tom Ring
wrote:

Hmm, I'd say about 61 years +-1 on the quote, and I couldn't guess who
used it 40 years ago.

R. Crumb

And blunt is now a drug reference if you haven't kept up.

Whoosh, over your head.

So who was it that recycled the combat advice?

Combat? I suppose you are fishing for the point award answers.
In Order:
Mr. Natural,
Flakey Foont.

As Mr. Natural would offer:
"If you have to ask,
you're not really with it."

To close out this round of Cultural Awareness, a question from Dr.
Naturlich:
"What does Do Wa Diddy mean?"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC