Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() -- ======================= Regards from Reg, G4FGQ For Free Radio Design Software go to http://www.g4fgq.com ======================= "N3UMH" wrote in message om... "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... How would one stiffen the overall draped loop though to prevent it being blown near metal in a breeze? ======================== What's the matter with metal, steel, aluminium ? Are they not good, low-loss conductors? No harm in running, if you must, balanced lines near to metal structures for a few inches. I have seen a method which involves inductive coupling between a pair of single turn loops. I guess the idea is that you have a loop on the tower and a loop on the mast (possibly both self resonant to present the proper impedance to the ladder line). You make them coplanar and close together so that they couple to each other, and connect the ladder line to their terminals. This, of course, only works for monobanders... 73, Dan, N3UMH ====================== Dan, you are quite right of course. I am incited to go further. I was concerned with the long-lived popular misconception, plagiarised by old wives like Yuri who have never thought about it, that running balanced lines very near to metal structures is the worst possible thing to do because it is 'lossy'. But nobody ever states how much more lossy it is. (Lord Kelvin.) In fact, if you MUST run a balanced line, even wide-open-wire stuff, near to an expanse of some material then the metals copper and aluminium are the best materials to run it near to. No significant extra loss occurs in the line - the only effect at HF is a slight reduction in line Zo due to an increase in line capacitance the length of line involved. There's no more radiation than what occurs from the line when it is isolated in space. Perhaps less. And as Cecil has observed, nobody knows what the Zo of nominal 450-ohm ladder-line actually is within +/- 15 percent anyway, although it has a serious effect on the performace of G5RV's and similar (hopefully no tuner) multiband antennas. The small currents induced in the adjacent 'foreign' metal run TRANSVERSELY on the metal surface over a distance equal to the line conductor spacing and are harmless. The other old-wives story that the line should be twisted may in fact spoil the effect and do more harm than good. It also spoils the cosmetics. The usual example is when bringing an open-wire or ladder-line into the shack. No harm occurs when bringing the line wires together for a few inches and drawing them through a single oversize hole drilled in a steel or aluminium window frame. A liitle more increase in insulation thicknes is advisable for high power transmitters. It is pointless to convert to a pair of short coaxial lines drawn through TWO spaced holes. That causes a much larger lump of capacitance across the line although even then, at HF, it will be harmless - equivalent to an unnoticeable readjustment of a tuner capacitor setting. The problem needs more thought when bringing an open-wire line through a timber, brickwork or concrete wall. Those materials ARE lossy (dielectric loss) and should be avoided. They may heat up when on continuous high power with standing waves located at a voltage (not current) maximum. ---- A few more icons demolished, eh Roy? ;o) Reg, G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
70 ohm dipole to 50 ohm feed line question | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |