That has nothing to do with his directional coupler circuit.

But at least Bruene is willing to attach his name to his views rather
than hiding behind a pseudonym. That in itself is worthy of a certain
amount of respect.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

John Smith wrote:
Doesn't look as if everyone like Bruenes' views...
http://www.w2du.com/BrueneRebuttal.pdf

Warmest regards,
John

Roy Lewallen wrote:
But at least Bruene is willing to attach his name to his views rather
than hiding behind a pseudonym. That in itself is worthy of a certain
amount of respect.

I've been wondering if John Smith is kin to Dr. Slick. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:

But at least Bruene is willing to attach his name to his views rather
than hiding behind a pseudonym. That in itself is worthy of a certain
amount of respect.


I've been wondering if John Smith is kin to Dr. Slick. :-)

No, Dr. Slick is the new name for Tony Blair who was just
re-elected by the British people, some of whom made fun of
us for re-electing George Bush.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Tom Donaly wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

Roy Lewallen wrote:

But at least Bruene is willing to attach his name to his views rather
than hiding behind a pseudonym. That in itself is worthy of a certain
amount of respect.



I've been wondering if John Smith is kin to Dr. Slick. :-)


No, Dr. Slick is the new name for Tony Blair who was just
re-elected by the British people, some of whom made fun of
us for re-electing George Bush.

Probably won't be salad days for him tho'. His party took a big hit,
and the way British politics work, that may cost him his job.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote:
His party took a big hit,
and the way British politics work, that may cost him his job.

Before or after New Years Day?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

No, you are quite correct, that paper does not... I didn't mean to infer
that, sorry if that is the way it appeared....

As to "my name", it stands for an ideal... I think that has been
misinterpreted here also... let me clarify:

"John Smith" = "Principles BEFORE personalities!"

Or, "John Smith" = "Anti-Hero Worship"... or, something like that...

I don't think if I wrote a book on that subject that I could find better
words, than "John Smith", to express that ideal... but, I can see some
explaination is necessary...

Warmest regards,
John

"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message
...
| That has nothing to do with his directional coupler circuit.
|
| But at least Bruene is willing to attach his name to his views rather
| than hiding behind a pseudonym. That in itself is worthy of a certain
| amount of respect.
|
| Roy Lewallen, W7EL
|
| John Smith wrote:
| Doesn't look as if everyone like Bruenes' views...
| http://www.w2du.com/BrueneRebuttal.pdf
|
| Warmest regards,
| John

But then, in a way, it does have to do with his circuit being for only ONE
input impedance!

Warmest regards,
John

"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message
...
| That has nothing to do with his directional coupler circuit.
|
| But at least Bruene is willing to attach his name to his views rather
| than hiding behind a pseudonym. That in itself is worthy of a certain
| amount of respect.
|
| Roy Lewallen, W7EL
|
| John Smith wrote:
| Doesn't look as if everyone like Bruenes' views...
| http://www.w2du.com/BrueneRebuttal.pdf
|
| Warmest regards,
| John