Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave
I was hoping that the IEEE would have a definition upon which I could hang my hat on. Hate to see another quabble like we had with TOA! In my particular case I have two elements coupled in such a way that even tho only one is driven the other is also of the same phase ie. additive, all other elements are longer than the driven element which suggests multiple reflectors, absent an accepted definition. Regards Art " wrote in message news:u85ge.72716$c24.9252@attbi_s72... When modelling close spaced element antenma assemblies it is possible that some elements are physically longer than the "driven" element. Is the length of a element sufficient enough to declare that element a " reflector" or are there other caveates involved.( i.e. phase) As background to this question I would point out that that it is possible to have two closed spaced (positioned) elements one of which is shorter and one of which is longer than the "driven " element, this combination being placed either forward or to the rear of the "driven " element. Regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CHAMPAIGN-URBANA -- Assistant Director for Technology (Chief Engineer) WILL-AM-FM-TV | Broadcasting | |||
Hudson Division Director Race | General | |||
Hudson Division Director Race | Policy | |||
Hudson Division Director Race | CB | |||
Hudson Division Director Race | Shortwave |