Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote:
If, by this description, you mean that there are four wires, two for 20M and 2 for 40M; then that is all good and well. Yes, there are four wires. Ok. Now I understand, it is called a Fan Dipole. Thanks. Okay. I did afew simple tests this morning. With output power at the lowest level (L - on IC-706, I guess this may output 5 W probably), I measured the SWR at various points at 14 and 7 Mhz. For 7 Mhz, I had to increase the power, as the SWR meter needle couldn't achieve full swing when measuring FWD power. I used CW as input. The SWR seem to be around 1.25 to 1.5 for higher frequencies (for almost all of 14 mhz), but touches very high values 4 and above on 7 Mhz. I used around 20W for 7 Mhz to achieve the needle full swing. By the time, I finished the 7 mhz tests, the radio got heated up. I suspect, that there can be an open circuit at the balun-antenna connection for 40m dipole wires(?). I am not sure.. Anyway, I am going to rework the entire antenna installation this weekend or next. Too bad, I cannot do it before. :-( I take this whole issue of SWR mismatch as a blessing in disguise, as it prompted me to read a lot on dipoles, transmision lines, baluns and general antenna installation decisions. 73 Ramakrishnan, vu3rdd |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On 24 May 2005 21:47:45 -0700, "
wrote: For 7 Mhz, I had to increase the power, as the SWR meter needle couldn't achieve full swing when measuring FWD power. I used CW as input. The SWR seem to be around 1.25 to 1.5 for higher frequencies (for almost all of 14 mhz), but touches very high values 4 and above on 7 Mhz. I used around 20W for 7 Mhz to achieve the needle full swing. Hi Ramakrishnan, Sounds like 40M needs work. The SWR values for 20M were spot on. Well, when you get to it this weekend, you should be aware that for a fan dipole, you should adjust the lower frequency band first. This is because its tune will cast an effect into the higher frequency dipole (because of near proximity - otherwise known as coupling and their harmonic relationship). Undoubtedly this tuning of 40M is going to upset what appears to be a well tuned 20M dipole. Such is life. Likewise, tuning the 20M side will cast an effect into the lower frequency dipole, but to a lesser degree. Several back-and-forths and the job should be done. Again, the lesson of flexibility and anticipating these ups and downs can reduce the pain of repetition. By keeping the two dipoles' ends further separated, you can reduce this coupling. However, I am sure this is dictated by the anchor points that support your antennas. You can allow the 20M to droop further away from the higher span of the 40M to accomplish this - several feet is a useful guide suggested here, although others might suggest less. By the time, I finished the 7 mhz tests, the radio got heated up. I suspect, that there can be an open circuit at the balun-antenna connection for 40m dipole wires(?). No, this "heating up" was a product of what I described earlier. If your balun-antenna connection works so well for 20M, it isn't going to limp along for 40M. A 1:1 W2DU style BalUn is very robust over the majority of HF, and certainly for these bands. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |