Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 May 2005 20:39:09 -0400, Jayson Davis
wrote: Lots of college age kids have become quite knowledgeable about microwaves and RF by experimenting with their 802.11 wireless gear. Hi Jayson, An observation that is borne out here often enough, but equally so with those who want to extend their cell-phone range. I see no reason they couldn't do this in the amateur bands because DXing, working SSB on 40 meters and all of that just doesn't appeal to them. This observation seems to both offer the question, and give the answer. The rhetorical speculation that follows borders on redundant. Or, you can let them do their thing, gain their knowledge and push amateur radio into further irrelevancy. Trying to force fit Ham radio into what "seems" to be their interest (HF download of 30MB PDF files? By RTTY for hardcopy?) will rate a goggle eyed response. This is about as successful as Bush selling Social Security. I think we all know where the prevailing winds are blowing. I've heard this dirge sung at wake rehearsals for more than 30 years. Perhaps if we just pushed a pillow over the old geezer's face, then we wouldn't have to wonder when. Try something like new modes such as Amateur Radar, Amateur SETI transmissions, or Amateur HAARP, or -gasp!- Amateur Broadcasting. We get more broadcast pirates here than 802.11 or cellular, and across the board the regulatory thumb is gouged into their eye with a vengeance. Visitors might interpret this as though we had something to lose ('cause we ain't gonna upset the FCC applecart coming to their aid). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|