Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H wrote:
One more time. It was a WORST CASE calculation which placed an upper bound on the possible loss from operating into a 1.7:1 SWR as opposed to a 1:1 SWR. In practice most of the power is eventually radiated. As Roy, W7EL, previously indicated: Power reflection coefficient: rho^2 = [(SWR-1)/(SWR+1)]^2 = 0.067 = Pref/Pfor 1-rho^2 = 0.933 = 93.3% forward power delivered to the load 93.3 watts is 0.3 dB down from 100 watts. The log of the ratio of two SWRs doesn't seem to have much meaning. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|