On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:12:34 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:


Still, Michael Jackson would never be left in the presence of my
children without me being present... (of course, now all my children are
grown) and I would be apprehensive about having him for a neighbor so
would set aside a place for him to reside--too bad there are no islands
left to exile his type too--perhaps a plea bargain could have been set
up with him and he would have gone there willingly...

Warmest regards,
John

No disagreement -- I was only talking legalities of "guilty" or "not",
not whether anyone would want to leave their kids with Jacko for a
bunk-over...

bob
k5qwg



"Bob Miller" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:05:23 -0700, Bill Turner
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:52:06 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

It is a legal fact that he is legally innocent until
proven legally guilty.

_______________________________________________ __

Is that really a "legal fact" or just a common presumption? The word
"innocent" does not appear anywhere in the Constitution. Look for
yourself:

http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html

If you know of an actual law which states the above, please quote it.

Amendments V and VI describe a process that would be meaningless
unless one is presumed innocent until proven otherwise.

bob
k5qwg