Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jer wrote:
I'm another Ham that could care less about DX! I just want to use the proper frequency depending on the time of day/night to communicate with some friends located around the west coast. Very few DX stations will hold a rag chew, just slam bam, thank you mam, i.e. 599 OM !... ugh.. At any rate, if I knew more about my antennas characteristics I might could figure out the band/end location where it would be loudest at any given time. Is this all wet, and TOA wouldn't help in that at all? The TOA isn't the way to get that information. What you need to do is, first, find out what elevation angle will be used for communication on each band at the time(s) of day of interest. Again, something like W6ELProp is good for doing that. Second, since you're interested in having the strongest signal, look at the signal strength reported by W6ELProp or other propagation program at each of those times. Next, use EZNEC to look at the gain of your antenna at the elevation angles you found with the propagation program. Finally, add the antenna gain to the signal strength reported by the propagation program at each band and time. The largest number will give you the best signal. This of course comes with the caution that propagation prediction is generally much less accurate than antenna pattern calculation, so there can be a lot of variability in the accuracy of the results. I think that if you go through this exercise a few times, you won't find much correlation between your results and the TOA. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
EZNEC ARRL and EZNEC 4 Demo: Setting default folders | Antenna | |||
EZNEC v. 4.0 at Dayton | Antenna | |||
3 antennas modeled with EZNEC | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |