Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Wanted to thank you both for having the patients to help with so many explanations over the past few months appreciate it the responces you provided on this thread is rather interesting , i understood some, but find myself not understanding 'all' and worse still, you raised further questions and a eyebrow.... now i must go once again to 'the books' something about this and keep forgetting the name , when a light is shined thru a splitter the 2 "" beams still have a relationship to each other then i think quantum things but even if i expertly understood all these parts, would I have the answers?? seems even w/o a through understanding these things are predictable, so why hasn't anyone built a radio that works on this ? seems it would go faster and further I dunno (referring to the particles that always are opposite once split)(if we could use force to flip one, and the other fliped regardless of distance, than 0/1 streams can be read no? hey people thought people like einstein were nutz too and he was smart m In article , Cecil Moore wrote: ml wrote: what would be the 'momentum' your referring to? is their a knetic/stored piece i am misssing? or are you just referring to like the flywheel effect for ex a large coil might have In 1619, Kepler proposed that it was the pressure (momentum) of sunlight that blows back a comet's tail. Maxwell, in 1873 said: "In a medium in which waves are propagated, there is a pressure (momentum) in the direction normal to the waves ..." From "Optics", by Hecht: "One of the most significant properties of the electromagnetic wave is that it transports energy and momentum." ... "Indeed, whenever we have a flow of energy, it's reasonable to expect that there will be an associated momentum - the two are the related time and space aspects of motion." And, of course, energy and momentum are two things that must necessarily be conserved. The bottom line is that if there are any reflected waves that don't reach the source (and also are not dissipated), they must necessarily have had their direction of energy and momentum reversed back toward the load. Anything else would violate the laws of physics. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflected Energy | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder | Antenna |