That being the case, here are the postings where the quotes came from.
The first quote:

"...it is impossible to build a 4:1 ratio current balun that
uses two 1:1 baluns on a single core."

can be found in it's entirety in the QRP-L archives at:

http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/qrp...12/020884.html

showing that it is not taken out of context, and the second quote:

"It's well established any balun made up of series / parallel
transmission lines requires different voltages from the start
to finish of each transmission line. "

can also be found in it's entirety in the QRP-L archives at:

http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/qrp...21/021331.html

again showing that it is not taken out of context. With very little effort,
anyone can go through this thread (as well as the spin-off threads).

Chris

,----------------------. High Performance Mixers and
/ What's all this \ Amplifiers for RF Communications
/ extinct stuff, anyhow? /
\ _______,--------------' Chris Trask / N7ZWY
_ |/ Principal Engineer
oo\ Sonoran Radio Research
(__)\ _ P.O. Box 25240
\ \ .' `. Tempe, Arizona 85285-5240
\ \ / \
\ '" \ IEEE Senior Member #40274515
. ( ) \
'-| )__| :. \ Email:
| | | | \ '. http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask
c__; c__; '-..'.__

Graphics by Loek Frederiks

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Clark"
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:03 AM
Subject: A Single-Core 4:1 Current Balun


On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:40:26 GMT, "Chris Trask"
wrote:

The design proves beyond all reasonable doubt that the above statements
to
the contrary are, to put it mildly, gravely in error.

Hi Chris,

It looks like you may both have problems.

Tom is quoted here, infrequently, but sparingly so where what "he
says" is often clipped to fit the argument in rebuttal. It would be
far simpler to completely remove what "he says" and present your own
offering for support or examination.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:15:44 GMT, "Chris Trask"
wrote:

again showing that it is not taken out of context. With very little effort,
anyone can go through this thread (as well as the spin-off threads).

Hi Chris,

And if I wanted a refinement of what Tom said, does he get the same
chance at dialog as you are seeking?

Too often this turns to one interpreting for Tom (me or you).

Again, you have an issue you wish to present, that's fine, if you want
a debate judged, it needs more than one wrestler.

Strip out the controversy of he-said-she-said and cut to the heart of
what you have to offer. For one, I notice you say you have an
improved BalUn. To me it looks slightly blighted irrespective of what
Tom may have to say (and I certainly don't count him as an authority
on the topic).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC