Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Old Ed" wrote A common-sense question would be: Why would Varney design a single-band 20m doublet that is bigger and more complicated than a single-band 20m dipole, unless he was looking for some added benefit--e.g., multiband operation? The reason Varney used a G5RV in preference to an ordinary dipole was because of its clover-leaf radiation pattern on 20 metres. He is quite clear about this. He could work Europe and N.America from S.America without changing antennas. Otherwise, for 20 metres, he would have chosen the better antenna - an ordinary halfwave dipole which also can be used multiband over an openwire line, the line being conveniently of any length. The reason the G5RV became popular with amateurs was because of its theoretical attraction when Varney published it. The ideas of cloverleaf and 1/2-wavelength feedline, combined in one simple system, were quite clever, easy to understand and therefore intellectually attractive. Also, 20 metres happens to be the best all-year-round, day and night, DX band. And so began the bandwagon. With a little forced imagination on the part of dealers, multi-band operation (on which it is weak) soon followed. Even its name, The Famous G5RV, sounds very nice. If Louis Varney had had a call like BF6POX nobody would ever have heard of it. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Windom vs G5RV : 1-0 | Antenna | |||
carolina windom vs dipole | Antenna | |||
G5RV vs. G5RV Jr. | Antenna | |||
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? | Antenna | |||
OCF Dipole vs. G5RV vs. Carolina Windom ??? | Antenna |