LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 05, 01:40 AM
Richard Fry
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Roy Lewallen" wrote:
As I'm sure you know, AM broadcast antennas intentionally radiate
very little sky wave, and that's what amateurs need for communication
beyond a few miles. Some care must be used in comparing MW
broadcasting requirements and characteristics with amateur
HF communications.

__________________

AM broadcast station verticals have very significant energy at elevation
angles that can be propagated by skywaves. As I'm sure you know, Class A AM
broadcast stations have an extended geographic service area served
exclusively by their nighttime skywave--many times more area than is served
by their surface wave, in fact.

Richard Clark's statement did not limit his conclusion to amateur HF
communications.

RF

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? Carl R. Stevenson Equipment 4 October 10th 03 01:57 PM
Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? Carl R. Stevenson Equipment 0 October 9th 03 03:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017