LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
Old August 24th 05, 05:01 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Reg Edwards wrote:
If the line is a whole number of 1/2-wavelengths, with a low
resistance ground the input impedance of the coaxial outer

conductor
will also be very low and longitudinal current in the line will be

at
a maximum. Insertion of the choke will be very effective.


To complicate things a little more, the common-mode current may
consist of standing waves. If the choke is installed at a current
minimum point, it may have little effect.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

====================================

Dear Cec, It doesn't complicate things. It merely repeats what I have
already said. When the line is an odd number of 1/4-waves long and
there is an (albeit indeterminate) ground at the transmitter end, then
there will be a high impedance at the choke (DUE TO STANDING WAVES)
and the choke will then be wasting its time.

If you havn't, moons ago, already downloaded the program then do so
and read the program notes. There are so many unknowns in it the
results are only approximate but nevertheless sufficiently accurate
for the intended purpose - which is just to demonstrate choke
behaviour.

The only accurate result is the calculated-from-first-principles
self-capacitance of the coil on which the impedance/frequency response
depends.

I had checked calculations, years back, by winding many coils of
various sizes and shapes, (one 7 feet long), with various numbers of
turns and measuring the coils' self-resonant frequency over the HF
band using hand-held instruments with coils suspended in free space
from strings. I always knew the results would be useful at some time
or other, never even dreaming about choke baluns.

Did I ever tell you that for several years I was Head of a
Measurements Standards Laboratory which I personally set up from
scratch and which was in the 2nd echelon from the British National
Physical Laboratory. The NPL.

There were certain electrical parameters for which the laboratory was
capable of making measurements more accurate than the NPL but for
obvious political reasons it was not possible for the laboratory to
claim such performance on calibration certificates.

Some time after I had left the position on promotion, the wicked Mrs
Thatcher had the laboratory dismantled and sold it off in bits because
it did not produce any immediate, short-term profits. She was a
chemist who went into politics. Often I still wonder what happened to
the oven-enclosed battery of 12 standard Western cells.

One day, if I can force myself to find the time, I may write my
memoirs. I could tell you some amusing stories.
----
Yours, Reg, G4FGQ




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Choke Balun Impedance Recommendations? MikeN Antenna 0 January 27th 05 03:04 AM
NEW - Choke Balun Program Reg Edwards Antenna 1 June 11th 04 03:55 AM
Antenna Questions ASW Shortwave 26 December 8th 03 04:30 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
How to test a balun? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 0 July 20th 03 05:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017