Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
With an MFJ-259B I just ran a test using an air-wound coil resonating with a series combination of 820pF and 100pF at about 44MHz, all strapped across a 4.7K resistor. The figures came out as follows - Inductor (calculated) = 146nH Real part of Zin (with 4.7k) = 14 ohms (tuned for X = 0) With perfect components, and the capacitor tap chosen, this should have been 55 ohms. Disconnecting the 4.7k (again tuned for X = 0) the real part of Zin increased to 20 ohms. This, if my maths are correct, means the inductor's equivalent shunt loss resistance was about 1.6K giving an inductor Q of around 40. Due to the similarity of component values used, these then are the sort of figures you should have obtained. Obviously the limiting factor here is the circuit Q but I supposed you had intentionally chosen this to meet a specific bandwidth target. Cheers - Joe |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Tektronix 497P 100 Hz-21 GHz spectrum analyzer | Equipment | |||
Sangean Problems? | Shortwave | |||
problems reading W3UHF's icomclassic site, too much 'script' | Boatanchors |