Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Bob" wrote I would also like to get an idea how "critical" it is to make sure ones antenna truly is horizontal (eg not an inverted V or quad loop) if noise is the greatest concern. One would assume you also get a similar affect of "less horizontal noise" from the actual noise source for the same reason. eg power lines radiate well upwards but not so well in groundwave. ======================================== Bob, The angle of the 'horizontal' dipole relative to the horizontal, whether it is an inverted-V or not, makes negligible difference to the amount of noise it collects. It is non-critical in this respect. The incoming, mainly distant noise comes in from all directions and angles and is randomly polarised. Except, that is, for locally generated noise, which is mainly a vertically polarised ground-wave and from low angles to which the horizontal dipole is quite insensitive. Noise radiated from nearby elevated power lines is probably randomly polarised and is collected in similar proportions by both horizontal and vertical antennas. When a power line is half-mile or more away I would guess that the received noise reverts to vertically polarised groundwaves which at HF are rapidly attenuated. The horizontal waves are even more rapidly attenuated. Noise can be studied only from its statistical probability distributions versus direction, angle, frequency, receiver bandwidth and time. The opinions and anecdotes of individuals matter only to the inviduals concerned and their locations on the Earth's surface. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
Mostly horizontal polarization of HF arriving at my antenna? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |