Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 2nd 06, 01:09 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default 80m mobile antenna question

Bill Turner wrote:
So how about this: I have a '95 Thunderbird
which I dearly love and don't want to cut holes in. I've been think of
going to a welding shop and having a metal piece made which I could
bolt to the frame in the back and which would stick out about six
inches or so behind the rear bumper, and installing a ball mount on it.
This will keep the lower part of the antenna about a foot away from the
body and allow a nice, long whip overall. The loading coil would be in
the center, homebrew of course. :-)


The only way to improve on that on 75m would be to mount
a piece of sheet metal on fiberglass poles connected at
the ends of both bumpers. The piece of horizontal sheet
metal, located 13.5 feet from the ground, would have the
same footprint as the T-bird and would be used as the top
hat. You do want optimum performance don't you? :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 2nd 06, 03:40 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Bill Turner
 
Posts: n/a
Default 80m mobile antenna question

Cecil Moore wrote:

The only way to improve on that on 75m would be to mount
a piece of sheet metal on fiberglass poles connected at
the ends of both bumpers. The piece of horizontal sheet
metal, located 13.5 feet from the ground, would have the
same footprint as the T-bird and would be used as the top
hat. You do want optimum performance don't you? :-)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~

I think my T-Bird might actually fly. :-)

73, Bill W6WRT
  #3   Report Post  
Old March 3rd 06, 05:02 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default 80m mobile antenna question

Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"The only way to improve on that on 75m would be to mount a piece of
sheet metal on fiberglas poles connected at ythe ends of both bumpers."

Kraus gives some support to that idea. Cecil has the 3rd edition of
"Antennas" In that edition, there is a "Disc antenna" on page 720 with
some similarity to cecil`s suggestion.

The "flush-disk" antenna, (d) in Figure 21-11 is said to be comparable
to a 1/4-wave vertical in performance, but has no projection. It could
be covered with a dielectric sheet, make no noise in the wind, and break
out no fluorescent tubes in parking garages. But, at 75m, the 0.3 lambda
dia. depression to contain it would measure 22.5 meters. That woud
require a vehicle that was very large indeed. At VHF and UHF it could be
very practical.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) RHF Shortwave 15 September 13th 05 08:28 AM
Question...mobile antenna "thinking out of the box"... M-Tech CB 19 August 19th 04 12:46 AM
LongWire Antenna Jim B Shortwave 5 March 2nd 04 09:36 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017