Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
Cecil, I guess I am a bit puzzled. The bugcatcher example I sent you showed a phase shift of about 7 degrees at 4 MHz. The current at the top of the coil drops off to about 85% of the base current. I believe the delay computes to something around 5 ns. That does not seem like a HUGE delay for a coil that contains nearly 40 feet of wire. I presume you can now duplicate and verify these results, since we have not heard any contrary information. That coil is real close in design to a genuine Texas Bugcatcher #680 from Henry Allen. Absolutely no one around RRAA clings to a rigid lumped component model, except your straw man. The distinction is that most people treat this non-ideality as a perturbation. You seem to want to elevate it to the status of realignment of the planets. It has been explained over and over why real coils are not ideal. I am sure you understand. I am not at all sure why you persist in carrying on this rather pointless argument. Actually Gene if you look at: http://www.w8ji.com/mobile_antenna_c...ts_at_w8ji.htm your EZNEC model's current agrees with similar coils in antennas I measured. I expect Cecil will ignore what you sent him, or announce it supports his conclusions by editing the data. 73 Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |