Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: William F. Hagen wrote: an antenna has an impedence at the frequency it is being used at, and an impedance at its resonant frequency. If either of these impedences happen to be 50 ohms and the coax being used is 50 ohms, and the transceiver is working at 50 ohms, then the swr is 1:1, and the swr is on the transmission line, not on the antenna. One source of confusion is, on systems with both coax and ladder-line, the SWR on the coax Vs the SWR on the ladder-line. A 12:1 SWR on 600 ohm ladder-line can result in a 50 ohm SWR of 1:1 without a tuner. The ladder-line can be used as an impedance transformer. That lily really didn't need the gold paint job, Cecil. But thanks for providing a source of confusion. How could we have a good argument without one. :-) 73, Jim AC6XG For additional confusion, *IF* your transmission line (coax or ladder line) is low loss, and if your rig can load into it, SWR doesn't much matter. Reflected power will "bounce" off the rig and go back to the antenna. Our rigs actually present a very low impedance to the antenna and transmission line. This is by design; we want all of the RF we manufactured to go to the antenna and none wasted as heat in the rig. Our rigs don't really look like the Thevinian equivalent (voltage source with internal resistor of 50 ohms) feeding a 50 ohm load. For a fixed voltage and fixed internal resistance, using a 50 ohm load gets you max power *into the load*, ignoring the wasted power in the source resistance. Your electric power company doesn't do that, efficiency would suck. They want all the energy used to be in paying customer's loads. They do that by keeping their source impedance very low. Actually, our rigs have a source impedance of only a few ohms, and are designed to pump power into a 50 ohm load. There is a delay involved with the reflected power getting to the antenna, but for the narrow bandwidth signals we transmit (SSB voice or code) this is not significant. It will matter for amateur television up on UHF, though. You can get a lower SWR reading than what your antenna is doing if you have lossy feedline. The lossy feedline is absorbing some of the reflected power. So don't be suprised at the worse SWR if you upgrade your coax. As long as you can load up into it, it's not a real problem. ============================================= "What did Santa say at the house of ill repute?" "Ho ho ho!" ============================================ Keep Santa in Xmas |