Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
coax test?
hi
If you buy a length of coax w/connectors on it , either a short jumper say 3ft or a run of say 100ft what is an easy way to test the coax as well as the quality of termination connector quality? accuracy is what i am looking for to ensure realibility at 1gig thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
coax test?
Easy way to gte a rough idea is to measure the power of your TX at the
TX output, then connect the coax and measure the power at the end of it. The loss/diff should be a published figure that is frequency dependent. If the loss exceeds the published number you have to suspect the cable/connectors. Cheers Bob ml wrote: what is an easy way to test the coax as well as the quality of termination connector quality? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
coax test?
"ml" wrote in message ... hi If you buy a length of coax w/connectors on it , either a short jumper say 3ft or a run of say 100ft what is an easy way to test the coax as well as the quality of termination connector quality? accuracy is what i am looking for to ensure realibility at 1gig "Easy" and "accuracy" may not both come in the same package. Bob Bob is right but you could also do a swept VSWR. In my experience, it involves a device called a network analyzer, which sweeps across the band of interest through a directional coupler at the near end of the cable, into a dummy load at the far end. It automatically samples the reflected power and compares it to the forward power to produce the SWR more or less continuously. (I believe the sweeping is done incrementally, with steps so small it _appears_ continuous.) The resulting info is plotted or displayed as a graph with frequency left-to-right and VSWR up-and-down, with 1:1 being on the bottom. Some cable is sold as being "100%" sweep tested" to some upper limit. Last year I had a case of a Navy shipboard satcom uplink transmission line that failed its sweep test at one spot near the upper end of the frequency range ... around 8 GHz. We had to replace it. (AN/WSC-6, for those who know what that is.) We had the contractor "shoot" it three different times with different test equipment each time -- always the same. The new line was fine. Until then, I had never seen a defective cable that was quite so frequency sensitive! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
coax test?
Something else possibly interesting
I use to work for a company that amongst other things installed mobile phone base systems. One of the mandatory tests was to sweep the coax from the TX end after it had been terminated to the antenna. Return loss (SWR) was the major criteria for the test pass but it also showed the location of the impedance discontinuity. (ie in metres from the feedpoint) In most cases this was a cable indentation where it wasnt unwound from the drum carefully, or where the coiled stuff had been laid down flat instead of being kept vertical. (ie was distorted by its own weight) We did have a few cases however where the inside of the inner core had slight amounts of corrosion causing the problem. This was commonly LDF4-50 or LDF5-50 (foam coax a little less and a little more than 1" dia and had an inner core "pipe" with an inside air space. Cheers Bob Sal M. Onella wrote: Last year I had a case of a Navy shipboard satcom uplink transmission line that failed its sweep test at one spot near the upper end of the frequency range ... around 8 GHz. We had to replace it. (AN/WSC-6, for those who know what that is.) We had the contractor "shoot" it three different times with different test equipment each time -- always the same. The new line was fine. Until then, I had never seen a defective cable that was quite so frequency sensitive! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
coax test?
In article NrIpg.833$lv.144@fed1read12,
"Sal M. Onella" wrote: "ml" wrote in message ... hi If you buy a length of coax w/connectors on it , either a short jumper say 3ft or a run of say 100ft what is an easy way to test the coax as well as the quality of termination connector quality? accuracy is what i am looking for to ensure realibility at 1gig "Easy" and "accuracy" may not both come in the same package. Bob Bob is right but you could also do a swept VSWR. In my experience, it involves a device called a network analyzer, which sweeps across the band of interest through a directional coupler at the near end of the cable, into a dummy load at the far end. It automatically samples the reflected power and compares it to the forward power to produce the SWR more or less continuously. (I believe the sweeping is done incrementally, with steps so small it _appears_ continuous.) The resulting info is plotted or displayed as a graph with frequency left-to-right and VSWR up-and-down, with 1:1 being on the bottom. Some cable is sold as being "100%" sweep tested" to some upper limit. Last year I had a case of a Navy shipboard satcom uplink transmission line that failed its sweep test at one spot near the upper end of the frequency range ... around 8 GHz. We had to replace it. (AN/WSC-6, for those who know what that is.) We had the contractor "shoot" it three different times with different test equipment each time -- always the same. The new line was fine. Until then, I had never seen a defective cable that was quite so frequency sensitive! just wanted to thank everyone for the responce, i wish i had a network analyzer(wasnt that for pc's?) or an coax/ant analyzer however easy wasn't ment to mean common tools that a ham might have i want to buy some used coax to taking adv of price but i need to test it, tnx |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Shortwave random-wire antenna question | Shortwave | |||
WXHL DX test - update! | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy |