Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 22:08:20 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:
I am trying to estimate the confidence limits for measurement of white noise passed through a limited band filter. In the first instance, can we consider the filter to be an ideal low pass filter. Hi Owen, This will possibly be your greatest source of error, the clipping of the spectrum. In Fourier Analysis, the operation is called "windowing" and there are a world of window shapes that offer either excellent frequency resolution at the cost of amplitude accuracy, or the t'other way 'round. Insofar as the window shape, this deviates from an "ideal" filter response, but then an "ideal" filter response (infinite skirt) does not guarantee accuracy. Blackman and Tukey in their seminal work, "The Measurement of Power Spectra" (1958) assert that "a realistic white noise spectrum must be effectively band-limited by an asymptotic falloff at least as fast as 1/f²." Consider the discussion at: http://www.lds-group.com/docs/site_d...%20Windows.pdf Shannon's Information Theory says to me that I need to sample the waveform at least at double the highest frequency of any component (the break point of the low pass filter). That's Nyquist sampling rate at slightly more than double than Fmax. Shannon predicts the bit error rate for a signal to noise ratio. It seems to me that what I am doing in statistical terms is taking a limited set of samples and using it to estimate the population variance (and hence the noise power in a resistor). Seeing that the RMS voltage is applied fully to the resistance, shouldn't that be signal + noise power in a resistor? The noise in this sense only describes the deviation from the distributions' shape. So I have plotted values for the confidence limits indicated by that approach, the plot is at http://www.vk1od.net/fsm/RmsConfidenceLimit01.gif . The x axis value of number of samples relates to the minimum number of samples to capture the information in the filtered output (in the sense of Shannon), ie bandwidth*2. When I've done brute force noise reduction through ever increasing samples, it always appeared to follow a square law relationship. Am I on the right track? What are you using as a source of noise? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Resonant Stub Measurement | Antenna | |||
Resonant stub measurement | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Stunning Consumer Confidence Fall | Shortwave | |||
Consumer confidence falls! | Scanner |