Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #121   Report Post  
Old July 24th 06, 11:56 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:02:51 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:


Must? Where's the "must"? Or do you mean "If you aren't intelligent
enough, or motivated enough, to learn a little, the only way to get a
license is to memorize the answers."


How else one can know that the unit of resistance
is the "ohm", except by memorizing?


There's a difference between knowing that the unit of resistance is
the Ohm, and remembering that the answer to the question about
Kirchoff with the 3 resistors is 10,000 ohms.
  #122   Report Post  
Old July 25th 06, 01:27 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,590
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?


Al Klein wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:02:51 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:


Must? Where's the "must"? Or do you mean "If you aren't intelligent
enough, or motivated enough, to learn a little, the only way to get a
license is to memorize the answers."


How else one can know that the unit of resistance
is the "ohm", except by memorizing?


There's a difference between knowing that the unit of resistance is
the Ohm, and remembering that the answer to the question about
Kirchoff with the 3 resistors is 10,000 ohms.

someone could memorize that sort of detail I spuose but you nor your
friends have ever advanced any evidence that this occurs Indeed I
don't think it is possible to memorize enough to pass the test and
learn nothing in the bargan I can't prove that of course but it does
seem likely

  #123   Report Post  
Old July 25th 06, 01:42 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

Al Klein wrote in
:

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:14:17 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

The fit get a ham license. All the rest get cell phones, CB, and
shortwave listening.


No, SC - in today's society we can't hurt people's feelings, so the
loud get anything they want.



I guess that means I got to get louder too. LOL

SC
  #124   Report Post  
Old July 25th 06, 01:54 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 530
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?


Slow Code wrote:
Al Klein wrote in
:

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:14:17 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

The fit get a ham license. All the rest get cell phones, CB, and
shortwave listening.


No, SC - in today's society we can't hurt people's feelings, so the
loud get anything they want.



I guess that means I got to get louder too. LOL

it is way too late for that SC

SC


  #125   Report Post  
Old July 25th 06, 05:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:51:08 +0000 (UTC), (Geoffrey
S. Mendelson) wrote:

Note that the original intent of the morse code test was that amateur
radio was to provide a pool of ready trained radio operators in case of
war. I'm in a country in the middle of a war, and I can guarentee you that
NONE of the radio communications are morse code.


And none of the current crop of CBers is qualified to provide military
(or any other coherent form of) communications.


  #126   Report Post  
Old July 25th 06, 11:01 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 487
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

Al Klein wrote:

And none of the current crop of CBers is qualified to provide military
(or any other coherent form of) communications.


Why? I assume you really mean that the current crop of new hams needs
education. Have you done anything? How many new hams have you elmered?

Are you active on 2m? Do you speak to new no-code hams and offer to teach
them morse code, let them see your HF station in operation? Have them
assist you during contests?

If all you do is hang out on the HF bands, and complain about how bad
the new hams are, they will stay that way. Whose fault is that?

73,

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838
Visit my 'blog at
http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/
  #127   Report Post  
Old July 25th 06, 02:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

On 24 Jul 2006 16:27:04 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

someone could memorize that sort of detail I spuose but you nor your
friends have ever advanced any evidence that this occurs Indeed I
don't think it is possible to memorize enough to pass the test and
learn nothing in the bargan I can't prove that of course but it does
seem likely


It's so likely that people have bragged about it.
  #129   Report Post  
Old July 25th 06, 02:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?

Al Klein wrote:
And none of the current crop of CBers is qualified to provide military
(or any other coherent form of) communications.


CW is not coherent. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Persuing a Career in Electronics, HELP! Justin Homebrew 18 August 1st 03 08:02 AM
Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue Ed Conrad Shortwave 0 July 6th 03 01:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017