Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Antonio Iovane wrote:
Thanks to all. It would make no sense using them in a ham radio station these days. They are heavy, space wasting, power consuming and noisy (they have a fan and electro-mechanical channel selection) and do not offer any advantage as compared to modern UHF stuff. Wait, wait, stop here. You've missed the whole point of ham radio. Ham radio is supposed to be fun. It's an avocation. If you want reliability and convenience, go out and buy an Icom. If you want something fun, the R-278B is more likely to fill the bill. Their destiny probably is dismantling, but so far I'm refrained from doing this in front of such a sample of vintage radio and mechanical technology. Mechanically they are pieces of art: all of the many rotating mechanisms bear precision roller bearings (gears, shafts and so). Indeed I dismantled completely a third one some 25 years ago, and thas has been better than a workshop on mechanics and radio design. I think I will save at last one as a future "historical" reference. Again, if you put a downconverter in front, and an FM detector in back, it could be useful for lots of things. You can modify a cable TV block converter to do the job, or make your own with a nuvistor mixer and a VHF oscillator. It's supposed to be fun. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Collins R-278B Receiver | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Worth-More 600 SS Amp | Equipment | |||
FS: Worth-More 600 SS AMP | Equipment | |||
FS: Worth-More 600 SS AMP | Equipment | |||
Worth-More 600 SS Amp | Equipment |