| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
A wrote:
Now, the second part of the question is: does it matter? If the filament life under normal operating voltages exceeds 20,000 hours, than dropping 5% and gaining an additional 18,000 hours, is probably not going to result in a noticeable improvement in life. Forever is forever. FYI, FWIW... Well, that is, kinda, why I was trying to bring the discussion FROM the "manufacturers recommendations" (on large populations) TO what is everyone noticing from their own (multiple) amplifier experiences and what everyone else yaks about in terms of their own (multiple experiences) with filament power tube lifetimes. Yeah...20,000 hours is a whole lot of ragchewing. I think I never in my life spent more than about 10-15 hours/week with amp filaments lit up. Today, I have the 813 filaments on about 2 hours a week (and drive the pair with a single 811 in gg and it's filament is on, also, and not not voltage managed, either). And, I've never blown an 811 filament, ever, and I had a few of those tubes in amplifiers, too. FYI, FWIW If we extend the universe of tubes observed to the TV and radio types, I would have to say that it is very rare for me to find a burned out filament in the 6.3 and 12V tubes. And very common in the very delicate 35-75V tubes used in series string sets. -Chuck |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| IC706IIG warm-up problem | Equipment | |||
| Warm wishes to the yankees | CB | |||
| 24 hrs after daylight savings time, and no Seattle area radio station is transmitting the correct RDS time! | Shortwave | |||
| WARM IT UP | General | |||
| WARM IT UP | General | |||