Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 6:48*pm, "Richard Knoppow" wrote:
"K3HVG" wrote in message ... Jim Haynes wrote: Maybe we need to discuss what you really want to accomplish. My experience with T-17 microphones 50 years ago is that they are just not very sensitive. *I assumed this is deliberate - to make yourself heard over the noise in an airplane you have to yell into the mike. Now if you want to preserve an authentic T-17 then I guess something like baking the transmitter is about your only hope, and you can only hope to make the mike as good as it was when originally manufactured. I remember lots of guys in the old days, who were not interested in historic preservation, simply took the carbon element out of the T-17 and attached the wires to a Western Electric F-1 element and taped it in place. *F-1 was the element used in the 302 telephones, forerunner of the later T-1 used in the 500 type sets. If you want to preserve the appearance of the T-17 but not the authenticity, then maybe you could get the original element out and replace it with either a T-1 or an electret mike behind the faceplate and nobody will know the difference (except you will sound a lot better on the radio). I was working with some military handsets a while back that use the equivalent of a T-1, and replaced the old transmitters with new T-1s. I also got an electret T-1 replacement from Mike Sandman - it was designed for use with a modular-corded handset, but with a little hacking I got it to fit into the older kind of handset. Has anyone worked out the circuit to use an electret like you get from Radio Shack - they have 2 and 3 terminal models - to replace a carbon element? Jim W6JVE Jim, *I'm surprised you didn't need an amplifier with that electret element? *That's what the carbon-compatible mics use in 2-way and avionic installations to get the required output level and the correct low-Z. *Also, the larger telephone elements won't fit inside the T-17 housing and would have to be mounted, up front, as you mentioned. *I did a military mic article for the June 2007 issue of Electric Radio, if anyone's interested. *DE K3HVG * * Since T-1 elements are fairly plentiful one can get the carbon granules out of one to repack the T-17. I did this a long time ago to repack a Western Electric 375 double-button broadcast mic. It worked fine but was, of course, tedious. * * Where the original carbon granules have been fused due to excessive current (too much voltage) simply drying them out will not fix them, they must be replaced. I don't remember how the T-17 element is constructed but most carbon mics are made so that replacing the carbon can be done. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah; doesn't 12 volts sound a bit high? While approx 100 ohms plus 1200 phms = 1300 ohms and therefore 12/13000 = about 9 mlliamps current, just wondering if a combination of packing, moisture and maybe a bit of carbon granule sparking at too high an energising voltage could be contributing to the problem? Energising voltage of around 3 volts was typical in many dry cell telephones sets; or even on sets where 48 volts is/was fed out from the telephone Central office . |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
help ID an old carbon microphone | Boatanchors | |||
FA: $9.99 US ARMY SHURE SW-109 CARBON T-17 MICROPHONE | Equipment | |||
FA: $9.99 US ARMY SHURE SW-109 CARBON T-17 MICROPHONE | Equipment | |||
FA: $9.99 US ARMY SHURE SW-109 CARBON T-17 MICROPHONE | Swap | |||
FA: $9.99 US ARMY SHURE SW-109 CARBON T-17 MICROPHONE | Equipment |