Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
On Dec 25, 10:04=A0am, (Scott Dorsey) wrote: David wrote: So here=3D92s my question: Building the pre-amp was a fun and useful project, but is my scope=3D92s performance without the pre-amp typical? No. =A0Something is wrong. =A0With the gain control set halfway, S9 signa= ls go way over the top of the CRT with my Collins R-390. =A0This is using log scale, too. If your problem is the same in both linear and log, that's one thing to rule out. The SB-610, which is crude oscilloscope, doesn't have a log scale. Are you confusing it with the SB-620 pan adapter ("Scanalyzer") which presents a frequency domain view of signals? I was indeed. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, David wrote: I did just what you suggest-- I connected the 1pF cap to the top of the IF transformer's secondary coil. David- Might the signal level be higher on the primary side, assuming the 1pf capacitor can withstand the voltage? Fred K4DII |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 26, 11:39*am, Fred McKenzie wrote:
In article , *David wrote: I did just what you suggest-- I connected the 1pF cap to the top of the IF transformer's secondary coil. David- Might the signal level be higher on the primary side, assuming the 1pf capacitor can withstand the voltage? Fred K4DII Fred, That might very well be the case. I can go in with my o'scope and see. Thanks for the tip. -Dave |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I fixed the problem.
My homemade coils/filters are OK. Using a signal generator, I applied a 0.5 Vrms signal to the SB-610’s vertical amplifier input and got a trace on the CRT that was about 1 inch high (thick), which meets the specifications at 3.395 Mhz. The problem was the 1 pf capacitor I used to couple the plate circuit of the SB-301’s second IF amplifier to the SB-610. I raised this cap to 6 pf and now have plenty of signal for the SB-610. Thanks for all the advice. It saved time. -Dave Drumheller, K3WQ |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 25 2009, 8:26*am, Jeffrey D Angus
wrote: David wrote: So here’s my question: Building the pre-amp was a fun and useful project, but is my scope’s performance without the pre-amp typical? I have one of those...And yeah, sounds like your gain is down a bit from normal. Jeff Yes, I think this is the problem. I put my oscilloscope on an isolation transformer and placed its probe across the tank circuit (filter) at the output of the vertical amplifier that drives the SB-601's cathode ray tube. With the SB-301 receiver tuned to it's internal 100kHz crystal oscillator, I measured an 80 Volt peak-to-peak swing for a 1/2-inch thick trace, indicating that the deflection constant for the CRT is about half of what it's supposed to be. I suppose I could re-engineer the SB-610 to account for the weak CRT, but it isn't worth it. -Dave Drumheller, K3WQ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RFSPACE SDR-IQ & LW performance | Shortwave | |||
Drake SW8 performance | Shortwave | |||
VR-5000 performance | Dx | |||
Equipment Performance | Shortwave | |||
FRG-7 performance | Shortwave |