On 7/21/2014 10:00 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 5:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Scott Smith" wrote in message
...
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver, Excellant Cond, Covers the 80, 40, 20, 15 and
10
meter bands (plus 15 MHz rx). Nice Cond, clean inside, good solder joins,
but only recieves various tones when tuning ????, Cost new $400 plus
building time, best off over $200, call 559-255-9110 or email



April 1st was nearly 3 months ago.

Typical troll response - showing his head is once again (or still?) up
his arse.


I quote from a contemporaneous response to you from another NG ...

"From your previous Childish Broadcasting (CB) into these NG,
it was inevitable that you would not have the mental capacity to recognise,
and partake in, a philosophical discussion for the edification of _REAL_
radio amateurs."




Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted it.

I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.

And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...

Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted it.
I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.
And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?

Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attantion in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult.

Shame on you.

High time that you grew up, there, OM.

On 7/21/2014 10:07 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...

Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted it.
I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.
And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?

Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attantion in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult.

Shame on you.

High time that you grew up, there, OM.



One thing you've again proven, Gareth - in a battle of intellects, you
are defenseless.

And you're too stoopid to understand that.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 10:07 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted
it.
I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.
And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?
Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attention in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult.
Shame on you.
High time that you grew up, there, OM.
One thing you've again proven, Gareth - in a battle of intellects, you
are defenseless.
And you're too stoopid to understand that.

"Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attention in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult."

QED

On 7/21/2014 11:44 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 10:07 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted
it.
I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.
And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?
Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attention in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult.
Shame on you.
High time that you grew up, there, OM.
One thing you've again proven, Gareth - in a battle of intellects, you
are defenseless.
And you're too stoopid to understand that.

"Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attention in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult."

QED




Yes, in a battle of intellects, you are defenseless.

No wonder the judge stopped you from wasting the court's time.

QED.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================