| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The regenerative superhet described by Mike is a good idea. it is known as
the "super gainer" and was pioneered by Frank Jones. They are described in the 1938 Radio Handbook. The converter in front of the regen receiver substantially reduces radiation by the receiver and also eliminates the effect of a swaying antenna. By setting the fixed if between two amateur bands, both bands can be covered with one oscillator coil. The drawback is an increase in parts count . For some, simplicity becomes elegance. There is nothing like honing your skills during a gusty evening, where the open oscillator coil changes pitch with each puff of wind and your movement around the room. For those, a digitally locked oscillator is heresy. Colin K7FM |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| my new mobile install - any thoughts? | Equipment | |||
| Stable Regen Receiver--Does it Exist?? | Homebrew | |||
| T-Kit 1054 Regen Schematic? | Homebrew | |||
| Thoughts on odd behaviour of 10m vertical | Antenna | |||
| Initial thoughts on my new 909 | Shortwave | |||