| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steven P. Burrows wrote:
The B+ voltage delivered by the new transformer is about 50 volts higher than Hallicrafters' original spec., which I was advised was not a big problem. That is correct, it is not a big problem, it is a *HUGE* problem. Most of these older radios were designed for a 115V nominal power line voltage. Today, people complain if the voltage is as low as 120V at the outlet. It is more typically 123 to 125V. That means that even using the original transformer, you will have nearly a 10% more B+ voltage than the designers envisioned. So, your +225 will be +240V. You are running 50 more than spec, so your +225 will be +275, which will kill the caps and shorten the lives of the tubes in your radio. (OBTW, the voltages I used in the above description are just guesses. I am not certain what the actual design voltage is for your radio.) .... Next I removed the safety filter capacitors from the transformer primary circuits. Fuse still blew. I traced out the primary circuit with a DVM and found no short circuits in my wiring or from the transformer windings to each other or to the transformer frame. With the transformer completely taken out of the radio the fuse blowing stopped. I was forced to conclude that the "new" transformer was a dud. It was most likely damaged by the manufacturer. It is easy to nick a winding through careless handling. The problem usually occurs where the inside end of the primary (or secondary) crosses the windings to get to the outside where the leads are attached. You can often cut the bobbin away, and find the short. I don't have access right now to a variac, but I suspect that there might be some sort of arcing in the transformer that doesn't show up until higher voltages are applied. I still have this transformer, and I might try looking at it again later this year when I can borrow a variac from the university where I work. Intermittent arcing is unlikely. Because of the relatively high currents, and low voltages involved, it will usually burn off a wire, or weld it permanently together. I have replaced the suspect transformer and so far the radio is working fine. My interest in using inrush current limiters is motivated by trying to avoid a repeat of a damaged transformer, both in my father's S-40B or my own. Transformers are relatively immune to voltage spikes. For reasons of manufacturing economy, the core is usually run right on the edge of where it starts to become nonlinear (eg. saturation is beginning). If a spike comes down the line, the spike will drive the core into saturation, and that simple act will prevent the spike from being "transformed" to the secondary. A lightning strike is a different matter. It will usually cause an arc from the primary lead that is closest to the core to the core. The lead will often be vaporized. In spite of having a fancy microprocessor based Sony SW-77 to do my SWLing on, I find using this old 'boatanchor' type radio irresistible. After I finish up grad school (which I am starting rather late in life - age 46) I plan to go for a ham license and possibly look into using other BA gear. They are a hoot! Welcome to the BA addiction/disease. -Chuck |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Antenna | |||
| FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Equipment | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
| Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||