Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Aug 2003 14:48:24 GMT, "Steve Stone"
wrote: Not lacking in news.. but lacking in local news. There is a difference. Do I really care that the subway is broke in NYC when no friend or family lives or works in NYC... or am I more interested to know that I-84 has a backup up for 10 miles at the Newburgh-Beacon Bridge because a tractor trailer full of hazmat dumped at a toll booth? (hint, I-84 can be seen from my backyard) I would guess that hundreds of thousands of people stranded in sweltering heat underground is a bigger story for a New York station than a traffic backup on I-84. That day traffic was backed up everywhere. Friends who live in New Jersey took as long as 12 hours to make a trip that normally lasts less than 40 minutes on a bad day. Most NYC stations don't know life exists north of Yonkers. Are they supposed to? Your issue is with traffic. I recall lots of Yonkers coverage when low income housing was proposed and the city made lots of nimby noise. It's rare that bedroom communities generate a lot of news. We do hear about murders of wealthy people We still hear news about ugly, self-centered, insensitive, PR socialite Lizzie Grubman running down the rich and famous at a trendy nightclub on Long Island. Very, very important news here in the city. She now has a radio show, giggly gossip about terribly important rich people. I always tell people to put your latest conviction at the top of your resume. It takes a local axe murder to get coverage from NYC stations up here. Unfortunately, that's news. Rich |