LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old September 21st 03, 01:45 AM
Sven Franklyn Weil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Rich Wood wrote:
Maintenance, not sound is the reason. Very soon there will be a new
transmitter site across the street from the current one. As I recall,
the new site will have 2 DX-50s.


Why get new transmitters? Aren't the existing ones still good (and one of
them is pretty modern?)

Wouldn't it be easier to just move the existing transmitters, one by one
to the new site?

Why is WOR changing transmitter sites ... again?

--
Sven Weil
New York City, U.S.A.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Federal Tel & Radio 7C23 vacuum tube Mark D. Homebrew 5 November 4th 11 12:13 AM
Vacuum tube characteristics OCEANRADIO Boatanchors 4 December 19th 04 05:05 PM
Vacuum tube characteristics OCEANRADIO Boatanchors 0 December 19th 04 04:03 PM
Frequency stability in vacuum tube VFOs, how do you do it? Robert Casey Homebrew 10 October 6th 04 05:59 AM
Vacuum Tube VFO Fred Homebrew 6 July 9th 03 10:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017