Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Robert Orban) wrote in message ...
Since the HDC codec provides 15 kHz bandwidth in stereo, while analog AM stereo is limited to perhaps 9.5 kHz (given an ideal receiver and understanding the absolute need for a 10 kHz carrier-beat filter), the digital signal will sound far better to anyone whose hearing acuity extends to 15 kHz, which is the bandwidth commonly accepted as being necessary for an impression of high fidelity. Judging by the samples on... http://www.wor710.com/Engineering/ib...io_samples.htm ....and from current tends in audio coding, it's almost certain that the HDC codec is using spectral band replication. In which case, all that bandwidth up to 15kHz is fake. There's a genuine 5kHz or 7.5kHz audio bandwidth, and the rest is synthesised. Quite badly, to my ears. The digital signal will also have a noise floor in excess of 90 dB below 100% modulation, making it immune to the static and manmade noise that has caused so many problems on the band in the last few decades. The fact that silence is silence will please some people, as will the lack of crackle and hiss. But the (hopefully inaudible) coding noise is only 20-30dB below the signal in a good, high bitrate psychoacoustic codec. Things will be even worse in low bitrate digital AM. I didn't know a 90dB dynamic range was part of Orban's business plan? ;-) Even disregarding the subtleties (of which there are many), these two factors alone make HD AM dramatically superior to analog AM stereo. Some people may be superficially pleased with the silence moments, and bright sound. However, listening to the samples, it sounds really quite nasty. IME, people can be very unforgiving of that kind of artificial, metallic, "computer" sound. btw - I'm in Europe, so can't listen to AM stereo, or IBOC HD radio off air. Our digital AM plans, if any, seem to be based on DRM. I doubt we'll see IBOC over here. It's sad that the world's radio standards will probably be split in the same way that the world's TV has been. That's if any consumers actually want digital radio at all. Cheers, David. In article , says... http://www.geocities.com/kevtronics |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Dx | |||
high quality graph of nice 0-100 analog scale? | Homebrew | |||
stuff for all hams | General |