Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Dorsey wrote:
In the US, ISDN was a flop because it was too expensive, too slow, and too late to market. If it had become available as quickly as it had in Europe and as universally, it would have been very popular. But it wasn't. (A) ISDN was faster than dialup - no one (hopefully) is claiming that it was meant to replace leased lines. (B) Yes, ISDN was expensive in some places. In Ohio we got lucky. Business ISDN was tarriffed per minute, but you could get residential for as little as $37/month for 75 calls/month (metered access, 8c/call after that) or about $45 flat rate. And I still maintain that ISDN was more useful for that time period than BPL will be now. **SJS (trying to tie this argument back into radio somehow, and failing miserably) -- JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED) Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
R J Carpenter wrote:
But how about WorldSpace satellite radio? They have a couple of dozen channels with coverage of Africa and Asia and much of Europe. They even carry different services on the various spot beams from a single satellite. I gather they rent some space to national broadcasters. Their receivers aren't dirt cheap, but well within the means of many people in the third world. I gather that they are NOT doing well financially, however. They have a web site www.worldspace.com . There was some initial relationship between them and XM, but WorldSpace's partial foreign ownership killed that from what I heard.. I can see LEO satellites as a possible eventual replacement for shortwave. But it's going to be pretty tough to get the costs low enough (both on the transmitting side and the receiving side) to make it fly in poorer countries. (I'm not familiar with WorldSpace's pricing) I've my doubts that any scheme that involves monthly subscription charges will work. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Sobol wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: In the US, ISDN was a flop because it was too expensive, too slow, and too late to market. If it had become available as quickly as it had in Europe and as universally, it would have been very popular. But it wasn't. (A) ISDN was faster than dialup - no one (hopefully) is claiming that it was meant to replace leased lines. The telcos were pricing it higher than many leased line facilities. Hell, you could get Switched-56 for less than ISDN in Richmond, VA. (Sadly here in GTE-land we couldn't get either). I could get a 16KC 2-wire crosstown for less than a quarter what a single remote ISDN circuit cost. And I could get the 16KC loop installed with a week's notice, instead of a year. (B) Yes, ISDN was expensive in some places. In Ohio we got lucky. Business ISDN was tarriffed per minute, but you could get residential for as little as $37/month for 75 calls/month (metered access, 8c/call after that) or about $45 flat rate. Residental ISDN? You have to be kidding! Was it actually on the residential rate schedule? I gather that was a non-tariffed service? That never made it out anywhere around here. And I still maintain that ISDN was more useful for that time period than BPL will be now. I dunno, but I'd sure like to be able to order 48F burglar alarm circuits from the telco again. Now THAT was a cheap way of doing remote work. And sometimes it even sounded good. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Residental ISDN? You have to be kidding! Was it actually on the residential rate schedule? I gather that was a non-tariffed service? That never made it out anywhere around here. Residential ISDN is available in the Nashville area. My boss had it a few years ago - actually I'm pretty sure he still does. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"R J Carpenter" wrote in news:co477k$som$1
@xuxa.iecc.com: But how about WorldSpace satellite radio? They have a couple of dozen channels with coverage of Africa and Asia and much of Europe. They even carry different services on the various spot beams from a single satellite. I gather they rent some space to national broadcasters. Their receivers aren't dirt cheap, but well within the means of many people in the third world. I gather that they are NOT doing well financially, however. They have a web site www.worldspace.com . There was some initial relationship between them and XM, but WorldSpace's partial foreign ownership killed that from what I heard.. I don't believe you can "see" the Worldspace satellites from North America, and even if you could, it's probably impossible to get one activated unless you have a european address. I realize the reception quality on satellite radio is much better than that on shortwave, but is replacing a free service with a subscription service really a sensible way to go (unless you own stock in the satellite company!)? -- Larry Weil Lake Wobegone, NH |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Voice of Switzerland prepares to bow out | Broadcasting | |||
Photos of China shortwave radios (and more!) | Equipment | |||
Photos of China shortwave radios (and more!) | Policy | |||
Antenna future | Antenna | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | General |