Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
--
X-No-archive: yes "jayembee" wrote in message ... "Biz" wrote: wrote: At least one of my local fm radio stations says that their radio station "is now broadcasing in high-definition" on their radio frequency. So what I need to know now is Does anyone know where I can buy a high-definition radio? and how much do they cost? Call letters of the station please? He probably doesn't remember, but dollars to donuts he has a recording of it on cassette tape somewhere... -- jayembee ============================== The HORRIBLE thing, is that dvdputz is correct for the first time. Several Seattle stations are broadcasting in "high definition" also: http://www.king.org/hdradio/ http://www.ibiquity.com/hdradio/ http://www.simplebits.com/notebook/2...0/hdradio.html http://www.wfuv.org/wfuv/digitalradio.html I think his being correct, however, is just an accident. ============================= |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Richard C. ) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
The HORRIBLE thing, is that dvdputz is correct for the first time. Several Seattle stations are broadcasting in "high definition" also: http://www.king.org/hdradio/ When the broadcaster doesn't know what is going on with current technology, it doesn't bode well for new technology. A snippet from that page: ================================================== =============== What does it mean that 98.1 KING FM is broadcasting in HD Radio=3F Technology? For those with digital receivers, the noise and interference that cause the static, hiss, pops, and fades heard on today's analog radios will be virtually eliminated. ================================================== =============== There is no static, hiss, or pops on FM radio. Fading (which includes loss of stereo) is the only artifact of a reduced-quality FM signal. -- Jeff Rife | "The Babylon Project was our last, best hope | for peace.... It failed." | | -- Commander Susan Ivanova, 2260 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Turner ) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
On 1 Apr 2005 00:25:22 GMT, Jeff Rife wrote: There is no static, hiss, or pops on FM radio. Fading (which includes loss of stereo) is the only artifact of a reduced-quality FM signal. __________________________________________________ _________ That statement is true only if the signal to noise ratio is high. If the noise is strong enough, you will hear it even without fading of the FM signal. No, if the signal to noise ratio is that low, there *is* no usable signal at all, and what you hear is the amplification of "nothing"...basically the same thing you hear when you tune to a spot where no station exists. -- Jeff Rife | "One minute we were spanking each other with | meat, and the next minute it got weird." | | -- Joe Hackett, "Wings" |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Jeff Rife wrote:
There is no static, hiss, or pops on FM radio. Fading (which includes loss of stereo) is the only artifact of a reduced-quality FM signal. __________________________________________________ _________ That statement is true only if the signal to noise ratio is high. If the noise is strong enough, you will hear it even without fading of the FM signal. No, if the signal to noise ratio is that low, there *is* no usable signal at all, and what you hear is the amplification of "nothing"...basically the same thing you hear when you tune to a spot where no station exists. True. If the signal fades, eventually you'll lose reception of *any* type of radio transmission. AM, FM and digital simply die different deaths, viz- AM - programme volume decreases and gradually disappears into noise. FM - noise increases and gradually overwhelms programme. Digital - nothing noticeable at all at first, then screetches and yelps and suddenly disappears altogether. Rod. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On 2 Apr 2005 23:56:43 GMT, Jeff Rife wrote: No, if the signal to noise ratio is that low, there *is* no usable signal at all, and what you hear is the amplification of "nothing"...basically the same thing you hear when you tune to a spot where no station exists. __________________________________________________ _________ Nonsense. You obviously don't listen to weak FM signals which can be heard, but with noise. Ham radio operators using FM do it all the time. My disagreement here is with your original statement "There is no static, hiss, or pops on FM radio." That statement is too broad to be correct. There are lots of exceptions. Yes - especially if by "FM radio" you include the standard broadcast stereo imlementation - where the stereo difference signal gets progressively noisier, meaning many radios include a force MONO button, as the stereo sum (i.e. mono audio) "lasts longer" - and clear mono may be preferable to poor stereo? I realise this is because the difference signal is carried using additional modulation techniques, but when talking about "FM" radio as a consumer product, most people mean FM VHF stereo as broadcast, rather than a purely FM modulation technique? Steve |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Announcing 'hifi-am', to discuss High Fidelity AM tuners and hobbyist transmitters | Shortwave | |||
Announcing 'hifi-am', to discuss High Fidelity AM tuners and hobbyist transmitters | Homebrew | |||
High school radio stations alive and well | Broadcasting | |||
Because I Got High-Michael Bryant | Shortwave |