Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:43:31 -0700, the messenjah wrote:
K. A. Cannon wrote: On 11 Aug 2006 15:33:00 -0700, wrote: Kevin - I don't think you've thought this through. I'm not a fan of Chuck's. But I assume you realize that you'll have to testify, assuming the matter goes to trial. Which means that you'll be cross-examined by defense counsel. Which *means* that all of *your* Usenet & Internet activities as it relates to Chuck and 'kooks' and AUK will be open to scrutiny. Are you prepared for that? Are you prepared to no longer discuss it if the jury acquits him? Dear AOL'er.... How does anything I have done on UseNet have anything to do with Lysaght making harassing phone calls to multiple people in multiple states? Please understand how the law works. You are sooooo ****ing pathetic, Cannon. You're a pussy. You're the one who makes threatening and harassing phone calls to people he doesn't really know, Chuckie, then fails to follow through on said threats. I think it's perfectly obvious who's "pathetic". -- __________________________________________________ ________________________ Hail Eris! Not Richard Scoville Richard M. Scoville is explicitly denied the right to archive any of my posts, under any of my nyms, on his site, FreeSpeechStore.com http://tinyurl.com/c222n |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|