In , "Brainbuster"
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote in message ...
In , "Brainbuster"
wrote:

No it is not. A defence lawyer stands up for people accused of crimes...
even child abusers. Are they "anti-legal?

Depends on their motivation. Why are -you- defending Twisty, Brain?


Hi Frank.

Once again... where am I "defending" him.

Well, gee Brain, I have no idea.... maybe because of your defensive posture in
your replies to posts against Twisty.... or maybe because of all the excuses you
are making for his absence.... or maybe by your shift from criminal defense
lawyer to pleading ignorance with "where am I 'defending' him?" Actually, to me
it sounded like you were attacking "George", using Twisty as a vehicle for the
attack. So if your motivation was to attack and not defend, why even bring up
the topic of defense lawyers?

I am being accused of things, so I am defending myself.

Go for it.

Aren't you supporting him by defending him in his absence?


Where am I defending him?
If you look, you will see that someone said that there would be no trouble
if there was no "Twisty".
I am pointing out that they lied, the crap is continuing... they have just
chosen different targets.
In fact, they are even posting messages in an attempt to get "Twisty" to
reply, just in case he is ignoring them.

Just a few questions: Do you believe Twisty is gone for good? Do you think
anyone else believes he's gone for good? And even if someone posts absolute
proof that he will never come back, how long do you think it will take for the
water to stop swirling after Twisty quits stirring the pot? When was the last
time you saw the name Mark Fuller posted in this newsgroup? Or Professor? Or
QRM2000? Or... etc, etc, etc.

BTW, those are just rhetorical questions -- I'm sure you are already aware of
human nature, and were just looking for a reason to attack "George".

Not one straight answer to any of the requests for proof of your claims.
You cannot back up one word of your false allegations and suggestions.
You are the weakest link... Goodbye.

And you watch too much TV.


Actually, I watch very little. That is a very famous phrase, but I never
get to see the program.

Count your blessings.

I watch the soccer with my Son (I would not be bothered with it
otherwise), but I don't have much time for TV.
I'll admit to listening to the radio most of the time... you can work and
listen, but TV demands your attention.

Twisty demands my attention, just like you demand the attention of "George".

So, why are you wading in, and helping Mr Dopers?

If I'm helping him, it's not deliberate. When you attacked him you defended
Twisty. Twisty does not need a defense lawyer, especially since this is not a
court of law.

I get the feeling that
there is something that you are hiding.

My butt-crack. I've been hiding it ever since I lost my ass to patty-melts and
onion rings.

I don't see a reason for us to
argue over the false claims that someone else has made... unless you care to
let us know why you need to get involved.

Perhaps for the same reason that you needed to get involved. Care to share that
reason with us?







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----