Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(Keyclownz R Dopers) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or
alan?

Why don't you ask them and everyone else about their opinion of
-YOU-?

You missed the point, assbucket. Brainfag


More childish insults.
Take a pill, sit down, and calm down... or you'll give yourself a
heart attack, OM.


said that AKC has chased away legit users of the NG.
If Dave, Jerry or Alan S isn't a legit user, then who is?


Did I say "ALL legitimate users"?
Exactly, you are either changing the issue on purpose, or you are too stupid
to understand English.

Are you denying that some users have been chased from this group?
I remember some people joining the group, and leaving within a week or two
because they didn't want the crap.


Just goes to show another brainfart lie debunked.


No, it goes to show your poor level of English comprehension... I
never said "all".

"Brainbuster" wrote in
:

Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(Keyclownz R Dopers) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or
alan?

Why don't you ask them and everyone else about their opinion of
-YOU-?

You missed the point, assbucket. Brainfag


More childish insults.
Take a pill, sit down, and calm down... or you'll give yourself a
heart attack, OM.


said that AKC has chased away legit users of the NG.
If Dave, Jerry or Alan S isn't a legit user, then who is?


Did I say "ALL legitimate users"?
Exactly, you are either changing the issue on purpose, or you are too
stupid to understand English.

Are you denying that some users have been chased from this group?
I remember some people joining the group, and leaving within a week or
two because they didn't want the crap.


Just goes to show another brainfart lie debunked.


No, it goes to show your poor level of English comprehension... I
never said "all".





Brainbuster, why do you keep responding to these pests..???

"Brainbuster" wrote in message ...
Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(Keyclownz R Dopers) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or
alan?

Why don't you ask them and everyone else about their opinion of
-YOU-?

You missed the point, assbucket. Brainfag


More childish insults.
Take a pill, sit down, and calm down... or you'll give yourself a
heart attack, OM.


said that AKC has chased away legit users of the NG.
If Dave, Jerry or Alan S isn't a legit user, then who is?


Did I say "ALL legitimate users"?
Exactly, you are either changing the issue on purpose, or you are too stupid
to understand English.

Are you denying that some users have been chased from this group?
I remember some people joining the group, and leaving within a week or two
because they didn't want the crap.


Just goes to show another brainfart lie debunked.


No, it goes to show your poor level of English comprehension... I
never said "all".

Semantic crap. Your getting as bad a Twithed.

(Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message ...
Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(Keyclownz R Dopers) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or
alan?

Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this newsgroup.
If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
bewsgroup.

Why don't you ask them and everyone else about their opinion of
-YOU-?

You missed the point, assbucket. Brainfag


More childish insults.
Take a pill, sit down, and calm down... or you'll give yourself a
heart attack, OM.

That might be the best thing for all of us!


said that AKC has chased away legit users of the NG.
If Dave, Jerry or Alan S isn't a legit user, then who is?


Did I say "ALL legitimate users"?
Exactly, you are either changing the issue on purpose, or you are too stupid
to understand English.

Are you denying that some users have been chased from this group?
I remember some people joining the group, and leaving within a week or two
because they didn't want the crap.


Just goes to show another brainfart lie debunked.


No, it goes to show your poor level of English comprehension... I
never said "all".

Semantic crap. Your getting as bad a Twithed.

Not "semantic crap" at all; Factual and accurate. But you don't want
to be bothered with either facts or accuracy.

You and Georgie are spending way too much time together; you're
beginning to talk and think alike (if you can call that "thinking").
It's only knee-jerk, spasmotic reaction, and it's totally ineffective.

Try acting your age instead of your IQ.

(Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com...
(Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message ...
Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(Keyclownz R Dopers) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or
alan?

Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this newsgroup.
If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM 12
pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz and
freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har your
foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker.

(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup)
spewed more garbage in message
. com...
(Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com...
(Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message ...
DouGayz A Doper wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(DouGayz A Doper) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or
alan?

Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this newsgroup.
If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM 12
pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz and
freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har your
foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker.

Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that out
for us.

(Cranus The Anus) wrote:
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free
Newsgroup)
spewed more garbage in message
.com...
(Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com...
(Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup)
wrote
in message . com...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message
...
DouGayz A Doper wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(DouGayz A Doper) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry
oxendine?
or
alan?

Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this
newsgroup.
If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM
12
pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz
and
freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har
your
foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker.

Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that out
for us.

You didn't, jizzbag. You said,,,,

If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

If you are a keyclown your not a CBer. Your a FEDERAL CRIMINAL. And by
your logic you are not a legit user of any CB newsgroup.

Assdrip. Cumhole.

(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com...
(Cranus The Anus) wrote:
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free
Newsgroup)
spewed more garbage in message
.com...
(Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com...
(Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup)
wrote
in message . com...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message
...
DouGayz A Doper wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(DouGayz A Doper) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry
oxendine?
or
alan?

Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this
newsgroup.
If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM
12
pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz
and
freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har
your
foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker.

Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that out
for us.

You didn't, jizzbag. You said,,,,

Thank you. Could you try to stay on topic?

If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

Which is true. Don't you understand the logic of the statement?

If you are a keyclown your not a CBer. Your a FEDERAL CRIMINAL. And by
your logic you are not a legit user of any CB newsgroup.

I think I understand: Licensed amateurs never violate a Rule? I
don't believe that for a second. I suppose you never use more
power than is needed for a QSO? That's a Rule. You never cause
interference with another QSO? That's also a Rule. You never jam 2
meter repeaters? That's also a Rule, and one we know you've violated.

Repeater jammers are FEDERAL CRIMINALS, DouGay. Try to remember that.

Assdrip. Cumhole.

How revealing of your intelligence quotient. (Even CBers don't have to
stoop to your level of foul language!)

(Cranus The Anus) wrote:
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free
Newsgroup) wrote
in message . com...
(Cranus The Anus) wrote:
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free
Newsgroup)
spewed more garbage in message
.com...
(Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com...
(Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free
Newsgroup)
wrote
in message . com...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message
...
DouGayz A Doper wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(DouGayz A Doper) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry
oxendine?
or
alan?

Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this
newsgroup.
If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w
AM
12
pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all
keyclownz
and
freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har
your
foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker.

Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that
out
for us.

You didn't, jizzbag. You said,,,,

Thank you. Could you try to stay on topic?

If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

Which is true. Don't you understand the logic of the statement?

If you are a keyclown your not a CBer. Your a
FEDERAL CRIMINAL. And by
your logic you are not a legit user of any CB newsgroup.

I think I understand: Licensed amateurs never violate a Rule? I
don't believe that for a second.

Big whup. What the **** does that have to do with CB, nut sniffer? You
sayin you wanna use the Rain report as your excuse to be a CB
criminal? Typical CB FAGGOT KEYCLOWN logic.

(Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote:
You
sayin you wanna use the Rain report as your excuse to be a CB
criminal? Typical CB FAGGOT KEYCLOWN logic.


Enclosed are recordings of
violations on the repeater by N8WWM. The transmissions continued for a
considerable time and there was no evidence of a control operator.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/
50 GB/Month