| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
October 15th 03, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#3
October 16th 03, 03:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup)
spewed more garbage in message . com... (Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com... (Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com... "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... DouGayz A Doper wrote in message . .. wrote: (DouGayz A Doper) wrote: really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or alan? Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this newsgroup. If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM 12 pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz and freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har your foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker. Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that out for us. |
|
#4
October 16th 03, 03:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Cranus The Anus) wrote:
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) spewed more garbage in message .com... (Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com... (Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com... "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... DouGayz A Doper wrote in message . .. wrote: (DouGayz A Doper) wrote: really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or alan? Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this newsgroup. If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM 12 pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz and freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har your foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker. Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that out for us. You didn't, jizzbag. You said,,,, If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. If you are a keyclown your not a CBer. Your a FEDERAL CRIMINAL. And by your logic you are not a legit user of any CB newsgroup. Assdrip. Cumhole. |
|
#5
October 16th 03, 01:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com...
(Cranus The Anus) wrote: (Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) spewed more garbage in message .com... (Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com... (Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com... "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... DouGayz A Doper wrote in message . .. wrote: (DouGayz A Doper) wrote: really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or alan? Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this newsgroup. If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM 12 pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz and freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har your foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker. Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that out for us. You didn't, jizzbag. You said,,,, Thank you. Could you try to stay on topic? If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. Which is true. Don't you understand the logic of the statement? If you are a keyclown your not a CBer. Your a FEDERAL CRIMINAL. And by your logic you are not a legit user of any CB newsgroup. I think I understand: Licensed amateurs never violate a Rule? I don't believe that for a second. I suppose you never use more power than is needed for a QSO? That's a Rule. You never cause interference with another QSO? That's also a Rule. You never jam 2 meter repeaters? That's also a Rule, and one we know you've violated. Repeater jammers are FEDERAL CRIMINALS, DouGay. Try to remember that. Assdrip. Cumhole. How revealing of your intelligence quotient. (Even CBers don't have to stoop to your level of foul language!) |
|
#6
October 16th 03, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Cranus The Anus) wrote:
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com... (Cranus The Anus) wrote: (Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) spewed more garbage in message .com... (Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com... (Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com... "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... DouGayz A Doper wrote in message . .. wrote: (DouGayz A Doper) wrote: really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or alan? Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this newsgroup. If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM 12 pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz and freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har your foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker. Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that out for us. You didn't, jizzbag. You said,,,, Thank you. Could you try to stay on topic? If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. Which is true. Don't you understand the logic of the statement? If you are a keyclown your not a CBer. Your a FEDERAL CRIMINAL. And by your logic you are not a legit user of any CB newsgroup. I think I understand: Licensed amateurs never violate a Rule? I don't believe that for a second. Big whup. What the **** does that have to do with CB, nut sniffer? You sayin you wanna use the Rain report as your excuse to be a CB criminal? Typical CB FAGGOT KEYCLOWN logic. |
|
#7
October 16th 03, 06:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote:
You sayin you wanna use the Rain report as your excuse to be a CB criminal? Typical CB FAGGOT KEYCLOWN logic. Enclosed are recordings of violations on the repeater by N8WWM. The transmissions continued for a considerable time and there was no evidence of a control operator. -- http://NewsReader.Com/ 50 GB/Month |
|
#8
October 18th 03, 02:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup)
spewed complete trash in message . com... (Richard Cranium) wrote: (Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com... (Richard Cranium) wrote: (Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) spewed more garbage in message .com... (Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com... (Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote in message . com... "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... DouGayz A Doper wrote in message . .. wrote: (DouGayz A Doper) wrote: really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry oxendine? or alan? Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this newsgroup. If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w AM 12 pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all keyclownz and freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har your foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker. Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that out for us. You didn't, jizzbag. You said,,,, Thank you. Could you try to stay on topic? If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB newsgroup. Which is true. Don't you understand the logic of the statement? If you are a keyclown your not a CBer. Your a FEDERAL CRIMINAL. And by your logic you are not a legit user of any CB newsgroup. That's a big "if", DouGay. And a huge assumption on your part. Which proves, once again, that you don't know anything. I think I understand: Licensed amateurs never violate a Rule? I don't believe that for a second. Big whup. What the **** does that have to do with CB, nut sniffer? You sayin you wanna use the Rain report as your excuse to be a CB criminal? Typical CB FAGGOT KEYCLOWN logic. What does anything you post have to do with CB? I don't even read the "Rain" report, it doesn't apply here at all; it applies to HAM RADIO, dimbulb. I've never so much as mentioned it. What does apply here is that you are a FEDERAL CRIMINAL and you're acting like a Keystone CB Cop. We all know that you are a repeater jammer and a pervert, thus you (like your alter-ego Aanal Aaron) have zero credibility. Please hold your head up high and blow your brains out! We'll stand on the sidelines and cheer. |
|
#9
October 19th 03, 03:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Neil Down wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote in m: In , (Richard Cranium) wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote in message om... In , (Richard Cranium) wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote in message ... In , N8WWM wrote: snip You ask wh You really need to see a mental health specialist about your obsessions, Twist. And I don't mean your imaginary shrink. When was the last time you saw yours, Franike? I see that your projection problems are common to both personalities. Maybe if the schisms aren't too wide a good psychiatrist can put them all back together again -- kinda like Humpty-Dumpty.... LOL! Could you try to stay on topic and maybe answer the question, Frankie? Why? Your topics are so boring.... BTW, do you know how to check the "posting host" of messages? If you were as smart as you think you are, you'd know I'm not Twistedhed. Therefore (pure logic here) you are a dummy. And we all know you're an admitted liar. That's right. And I'm not "George", either. What station did you say you worked for? I didn't think so. Heh-heh-heh! What did you say your call was? I didn't think so. Heh-heh-heh! Make the same deal with him that he did with aaron, he tells you his call and you can then tell him where you worked. That is only fair since it is exactly what he asked someone else to do. How about he follows Twisty's 'golden rule'? Cranium was asked for his call long before he started begging me for my work info. Now to apply the gospel according to Twisty, if Cranium wants my info then he should come through with answers for the questions he was already asked. Right? I have cranus the anus's call right he AE352. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The Problem of Mixing Religion and Science | Antenna | |||
| Anyone ever had a fatal electric shock? | Homebrew | |||
| WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
