moistrous wrote:

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:46:00 -0500, Twistedhed wrote:

It was cleared up when you were asked to provide for your claim.

yeah, no ****, it was in my immediate followup to that message when i said
it was clear. Does everyone in here run around with their cb antennas
shoved up their asses or something? Everyone is a ******* to everyone
else, an assumption based on the topic of EVERY message in this rotten
newsgroup.


This is the result of rampant paranoia, fostered by the suspicion that
anyone asking a question such as yours, is automatically a troll and
just looking for trouble.

Sometimes this is the case, but if certain people appear abrasive, it's
because they are.

Legal class "D" CB radios manufactured for the U.S. market are limited
by law to 40 channels (Except older pre-1977 radios which were 23
channels).

There are radios made for the export market which have many more
channels modes and power. They are very real, and even manage to find
their way into the U.S. market (albeit illegally).

There is also questionable marketing literature which incorrectly refers
to AM/SSB radios as having "120 channels", when in fact it's only 40
channels with 3 modes available on each channel. It's not the same
thing.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:

Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever
to Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before,
that's not grounds for being a punk to me.

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:02:26 -0500, moistrous wrote:

hi, i'm new to CB radio... How many channels are there? It looks as if
there are 40 channels, but i see some cb radios advertised that can go to
ch.80... what gives? Any website i visit says the legal frequency range is
from 26.965 to 27.405 MHz, and ch 40 IS 27.405 so it doesn't make sense to
have another 40 channels present. Help meeee!

- moistrous

This message is a "thank you" that goes out to the noble few who _did_
answer my question in a helpful manner. You know who you are, Thank you!

moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:

Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever
to Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before,
that's not grounds for being a punk to me.

**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with
that nym.

Steveo wrote:

moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:

Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever
to Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before,
that's not grounds for being a punk to me.

**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with
that nym.

Did you notice how Willard "Blake" Williams used the word punk?
Must be a New Hampshire thing.

From: (moistrous)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:
Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever to
Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you.

Not among these pages, shall that ever be the case.

So i've never posted here before, that's not

grounds for being a punk to me.

You posted with a bogus email address and you came out cursing. My guess
is you're a troll that was likely relegated to a new supernews account
who just had their last ISP canned for noncompliance of TOS, and my
thoughts are usually 99% dead-on accurate, thanks to all my friends in
this group who lend tons of support and play some of the lessers like
cheap fiddles. If I'm wrong, you'll be around for awhile and my
apologies will go out to you,,,but,,,I don't think I am....there is no
reason to post without a valid email address unless you're A) looking to
start something or B) hiding.
Spam is not a valid defense, as many have creatively figured out a
manner in which to display their email addy while fooling the spam
bots.,,,you're not one of them.

From: (moistrous)
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:02:26 -0500, moistrous wrote:
hi, i'm new to CB radio... How many channels are there? It looks as if
there are 40 channels, but i see some cb radios advertised that can go
to ch.80... what gives? Any website i visit says the legal frequency
range is from 26.965 to 27.405 MHz, and ch 40 IS 27.405 so it doesn't
make sense to have another 40 channels present. Help meeee!
- moistrous
This message is a "thank you" that goes out to the noble few who _did_
answer my question in a helpful manner. You know who you are, Thank you!
_
This message is to point out a few things (Its what I do best). The last
several times Dave Hall posted, he was answering a "hit-and-run" newbie.
A "hit-and-run newbie" , for those who do not know, is a shill, usually
when one is talking to themself,,,it's usually a new phony posting name,
obscured in the same juvenile manner (fake domain ALWAYS added)
concocted by the poster, that never appears again. In all 3 of his last
exchanges, said newbie came back and vehemnetly thanked Davie for
"coming to his aid". LOL.....that polishing of the ego gets 'em
everytime! This room ain't that big...LOL!

From: (Lancer)
Steveo wrote:
moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:
Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever to
Usenet, in this or any group.
That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before, that's
not grounds for being a punk to me.
**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with that nym.

Did you notice how Willard "Blake" Williams

used the word punk? Must be a New

Hampshire thing.
_
Not at all. Try Pa. This time, you're way off the mark.

From:
"Train" wrote:
Hey Twisty..................What am I missing on these pages?
Train
_
Mopar wrote:
Kathleen R. Lee, CPA...dogies girlfriend got

popped for filing bogus tax papers..that's a

felony.
"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
http://acc.ohio.gov/dhearing.html
http://acc.ohio.gov/bdmn0401.html
Once again, N8WWM's blatant hypcocrisy concerning his values and speak
of felons and the law are shown to be absolute lies and bull****! Happy
Holidays to the hammies (in the clubs and otherwise) in the BUCKEYE!
GOBBLE GOBBLE!
_
She's no CPA. The great state of Ohio yanked her license.
Update: Dogie is in the cb doghouse. Kath is going ape **** on Dogie and
demanded of him he leave this posting "nonsense" alone...hahhaha! (ears,
ears, everywhere) She may even be gone by now, if she has any sense,
unless he swore off usenet forever,,,,LOL. Imagine N8WWM being handed
that ultimatum,,,,hooohooo! No matter what he does, it's gonna be very
interesting in cb and hammie land in Ohio. Poor Dogie can't handle the
fame he chased for years. Northern Ohio hammies ( and there are a BUNCH
of them) are more than willing to assist when it comes to turning the
tables on trash who would jam their frequencies repeatedly then
vehemently deny all on usenet (exactly like his unprovoked, hostile and
vile behavior in here for the last several years). It goes without say,
the manner in which people post is more than likely the same manner in
which they conduct themselves on air. No wonder hammie radio is in
trouble.

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:04:51 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Lancer)
Steveo wrote:
moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:
Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever to
Usenet, in this or any group.
That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before, that's
not grounds for being a punk to me.
**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with that nym.

Did you notice how Willard "Blake" Williams

used the word punk? Must be a New

Hampshire thing.
_
Not at all. Try Pa. This time, you're way off the mark.


Where do you see PA? look at the message ID.