In , Frank Gilliland
wrote:

snip
Being the nice guy I am, I'll play this your way once again: If the reason for
having a weapon in your home is 'protection', then what are you protecting? Life
and property, right? Right. Now, which is more likely to be a threat to life and
property, rock salt or lead? If the weapon gets turned against you (which
happens more times than you think), or if the wrong person gets shot by accident
(accidents happen more often than home invasions), would you rather it be loaded
with rock salt or with lead? You are better protected with a shotgun filled with
rock salt because you are better protected against the realities of gun
ownership, realities that are both expected and unforseen. Now you can tell
yourself that such things will never happen to you because you are under the
delusion that you are in 100% control of your weapon. That's what a lot of
people think. Some of them realize they are wrong -before- someone gets hurt.
Others learn the hard way.


And someone learned their lesson last night here in Spokane. A 13yo girl caught
one in the head because the person with the gun thought it wasn't loaded.



So where's that military group, Twist?



=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:53:46 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
And someone learned their lesson last night here in Spokane. A 13yo girl
caught
one in the head because the person with the gun thought it wasn't loaded.


and of course if she had been shot in the forehead with a shotgun loaded with
rock salt at a distance of 10 feet, she wouldn't have suffered any injuries?

Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Frank Gilliland
wrote:

snip
Being the nice guy I am, I'll play this your way once again: If the
reason for having a weapon in your home is 'protection', then what are
you protecting? Life and property, right? Right. Now, which is more
likely to be a threat to life and property, rock salt or lead? If the
weapon gets turned against you (which happens more times than you
think), or if the wrong person gets shot by accident (accidents happen
more often than home invasions), would you rather it be loaded with rock
salt or with lead? You are better protected with a shotgun filled with
rock salt because you are better protected against the realities of gun
ownership, realities that are both expected and unforseen. Now you can
tell yourself that such things will never happen to you because you are
under the delusion that you are in 100% control of your weapon. That's
what a lot of people think. Some of them realize they are wrong -before-
someone gets hurt. Others learn the hard way.

And someone learned their lesson last night here in Spokane. A 13yo girl
caught one in the head because the person with the gun thought it wasn't
loaded.

So where's that military group, Twist?

That sucks. The murder rate will now triple with the new CCP laws. It's
gonna be the wild wild west.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

Snotgeorge wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:53:46 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
And someone learned their lesson last night here in Spokane. A 13yo
girl caught
one in the head because the person with the gun thought it wasn't
loaded.


and of course if she had been shot in the forehead with a shotgun
loaded with rock salt at a distance of 10 feet, she wouldn't have
suffered any injuries?

We all know how blanks worked out for Brandon Lee. Frank should do a
Hemmingway with some of those "blanks".

--
_____________________________________
Hotel sheets, rental cars, late flights, fast food.
What's not to love about consulting?!?!?

In ,
(Snotgeorge) wrote:

On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:53:46 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
And someone learned their lesson last night here in Spokane. A 13yo girl
caught
one in the head because the person with the gun thought it wasn't loaded.


and of course if she had been shot in the forehead with a shotgun loaded with
rock salt at a distance of 10 feet, she wouldn't have suffered any injuries?


She probably wouldn't still be in critical condition, and she probably wouldn't
have to deal with a future of reconstructive surgery and possible brain damage.
Cute girl, too -- they post her picture on the news every day. Now her life is
****ed because of some dimwit like Twisty who thought he was intelligent enough
to safely wield a deadly weapon. What a waste.



=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

In , Steveo
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Frank Gilliland
wrote:

snip
Being the nice guy I am, I'll play this your way once again: If the
reason for having a weapon in your home is 'protection', then what are
you protecting? Life and property, right? Right. Now, which is more
likely to be a threat to life and property, rock salt or lead? If the
weapon gets turned against you (which happens more times than you
think), or if the wrong person gets shot by accident (accidents happen
more often than home invasions), would you rather it be loaded with rock
salt or with lead? You are better protected with a shotgun filled with
rock salt because you are better protected against the realities of gun
ownership, realities that are both expected and unforseen. Now you can
tell yourself that such things will never happen to you because you are
under the delusion that you are in 100% control of your weapon. That's
what a lot of people think. Some of them realize they are wrong -before-
someone gets hurt. Others learn the hard way.

And someone learned their lesson last night here in Spokane. A 13yo girl
caught one in the head because the person with the gun thought it wasn't
loaded.

So where's that military group, Twist?

That sucks. The murder rate will now triple with the new CCP laws. It's
gonna be the wild wild west.


CCP laws?





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Steveo
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Frank Gilliland
wrote:

snip
Being the nice guy I am, I'll play this your way once again: If the
reason for having a weapon in your home is 'protection', then what
are you protecting? Life and property, right? Right. Now, which is
more likely to be a threat to life and property, rock salt or lead?
If the weapon gets turned against you (which happens more times than
you think), or if the wrong person gets shot by accident (accidents
happen more often than home invasions), would you rather it be loaded
with rock salt or with lead? You are better protected with a shotgun
filled with rock salt because you are better protected against the
realities of gun ownership, realities that are both expected and
unforseen. Now you can tell yourself that such things will never
happen to you because you are under the delusion that you are in 100%
control of your weapon. That's what a lot of people think. Some of
them realize they are wrong -before- someone gets hurt. Others learn
the hard way.

And someone learned their lesson last night here in Spokane. A 13yo
girl caught one in the head because the person with the gun thought it
wasn't loaded.

So where's that military group, Twist?

That sucks. The murder rate will now triple with the new CCP laws. It's
gonna be the wild wild west.

CCP laws?

Concealed carry permit. Take a class, pass a simple test, and
you are allowed to carry a concealed gun. You no longer need
to show reason or need in Ohio.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

"I work for an organization that is legally authorized to use the
freeband" - Frank Gilliland


"I have admitted lying in this newgroup, and on more than one occasion"
- Frank Gilliland


"Everything I say is a lie" - Frank Gilliland


"It is the citizen's job to enforce the law" - Frank Gilliland

CCP laws,,,forget it. Frank has exhibited beyond a shadow of a doubt not
only knowing what they teach in such courses, but what the hell they
are. He thinks and claims a few LEO's that may teach such a course,
teach the pubic the same manner in which they were trained regarding
self-defense and firing a weapon.