Subject: NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics
Path:
lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!feed2.newsrea der.com!news
reader.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!postnews1.google.com!postnews2.goo
gle.com!not-for-mail
From: (I Am Not George)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
Date: 11 Jun 2004 11:45:41 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 6
Message-ID:
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.132.5.12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1086979542 19623 127.0.0.1 (11 Jun 2004 18:45:42
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:45:42 +0000 (UTC)



(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote in message
...
This article by columnist Ian Austin appeared in yesterday's (June 10)
New York Times. I sent Mr. Vincent an email concerning
some past posts regarding antenna designs and tests.

oh yeah Twisty I sent him an email too ROTFLMMFAO


Enamoured with twisty, aren't we? His email address is listed on his qrz
homepage. What did your email say?