LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18   Report Post  
Old September 29th 04, 04:49 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
sideband wrote in message
. com... Because Mopar
isn't part of the problems... Those problem being the disparaging of
Amateur radio, and the trashing of this newsgroup so that those who are
in the know can help get things back down to a sane level. Mopar may or
may not operate CB illegally. I don't know for sure. I've never seen his
station. That's not the point. The point is, your tactics are more
destructive than constructive. Besides, the way you kids throw things
around, whoever you're implying is "in control", who hasn't come forward
and claimed responsibility for his actions, probably isn't.
-SSB
_
???get your facts straight


the destructive tactic started with the


keyclowns going back to john wilkerson and


mark fuller who were called gay because they


supported legal cb.



By those you attack in here on a daily basis? Not even remotely true.
Someone left their mark on you and wounded you deeply, as there has been
no "Mark Fuller" here in years and years, yet, you attack all those with
whom you disagree (illustrating your incredible low self-esteem and on a
daily basis. Using something that was said to you years and years ago on
usenet as a means of justifying your life's daily errant and erratic
behavior, attacks against all who educate you, and your depression is
something you will have no luck in getting others to believe.


hell even frank and jerry o. was called gay by


keyclowns for dissent against illegal cb.




If that indeed occurred, it never offended Frank, as I don't recall him
spazzing over such whimsical insult or something as impotent as another
calling him a name. Besides, Frank will not only back what he says when
he believes it with his own dialog and explanation, he will argue
vehemently for his position, popular or not. Jerry doesn't provide
anything for his accusations and claims, just hurls and tosses a few
accusational barbs and clams up when shown he is wrong. Pity, too, cause
the guy had some great info over the years and at one time was a
positive contributor, despite his radical approach, but alas...he fell
victim to his own hand.
In any event, if what you claimed above is true and it unsettles you as
much as you share, then you should direct your inner anguishes to those
that made such comments, not to the rest of the world whenever it
disagrees with you.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) Dr. Slick Antenna 183 October 2nd 20 10:44 AM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM
RF amps: tuned load in Class A? Don Pearce Homebrew 141 September 15th 03 05:02 AM
High-el needs to learn the definition ofstalking Dave Heil Policy 0 August 18th 03 04:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017