Oh please. The TROLLS are hams...or alledged to be anyway. How can you say
it has nothing to do with CB vs HAM?? Every disgusting, filth-laced post
I've read is from a disgruntled ham and aimed at a cb'er. You think it's
cb'ers calling cb'ers "keyclowns"??? You think it's cb'ers who are bitching
about the 15% of the posts that deal with illegal cb stuff?

Ah screw it. It's not worth my time anyway....I'll just fire up the filters
and hopefully share idea's/solutions with people who have an interest in cb
other than running it down...or playing keyboard commando/federal agent.

Don

"Landshark" wrote in message
m...

"M-Tech" wrote in message
...
Look, no offense, the only thing that's been "discredited" in this group
in the last 2 months (since I've been here anyway)is the fact that the
hams (or those professed to be so) are a bunch of whining azzholes.
Some, including yourself, add MUCH needed tech/help. But MOST hams are
only here for ONE purpose, to disrupt the group.....

Legal or illegal makes no difference to me.....since the group *is*
rec.radio.cb. Not legal.cb/illegal.cb or HAM. It's also NOT up to the
group to determine what's legal/illegal imho. We already have a FCC to
do this. Geez, the population of the cb'er is so damn small I can't
believe hams actually waste their time bitching about it. Back in the
70's-80's, that was a different story.

I'd rather read "illegal" cb crap than the disgusting remarks made by
alledged hams. I condone neither....but the latter has NOTHING to do
with "cb".

There is NO excuse for operating ANYTHING illegally...there's also NO
excuse for a ham to come to a "cb group" and state the obvious....other
than the fact that the ones who do, are bigger keyclowns than the ones
they profess to police. Just look at the damned posts???? Disgusting
representation of hams I'd say.

Don


Actually it has nothing at all to do with Ham vs CB'r, it's
just a plain out right troll problem.

Landshark


--
My bad..the camera is mightier than the blowhard(s)..in most respects.