On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:46:48 GMT, "U Know Who"
wrote:


"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...

Reply to: "Uncle Hal" I don't Want To Hear From You! From:
"Uncle Hal" Don't Bother Group: rec.radio.cb Subject:
saturday was great Date: Sun, Dec 5, 2004, 7:26am (EST-1)
Organization: Don't Write X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority:
Normal X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Complaints-To:

Just a quick update for the AKC.

There was recorded telephone conversation

between a "customer" and a keyclown

supplier.


The FCC can do nothing but contact the person. The FCC must personally
witness the infraction prior to ANY action against the offender.
Besides, you broke the law the second you began taping a telephone
conversation without the person's implicit permission and
acknowlegement.
You're not only a hypocrite when it comes to the law, you're an
uninformed hypocrite concerning the laws of the FCC that govern
communications. Educate yourself.


Twist, I *think* you might be mistaken on this one. The way *I* understand
it, it is legal to tape a telephone conversation as long as one of the
parties is aware it is being taped. Basically, it prevents wire-tapping
where neither party is aware. A case in point would be where a husband who
suspects his wife of cheating tapes her and the guy she is cheating with,
without the knowledge of either. I know that is illegal, because we had a
city councilman do that here...he wound up getting federal charges and
felony for his eavesdropping. But, I still think it is legal for a person to
tape another party without telling them.

I may be wrong, but I don't think so.


Depends on what state you are in. In Texas as long as one party knows
it being recorded its legal.