From:
(Twistedhed) wrote in news:27923-41B5C689-445
@storefull-3256.bay.webtv.net:
Nope. It is illegal to tape a private conversation without the explicit
permission of the partiy OR parties being taped. In other words, it is
illegal to tape a party without their knowledge.

better tell that to that woman who taped Bill

Orielly or how bout Linda Tripp or the Scott

Peterson case, no there was no judge

permission beforehand and no they were not

police officers it was recorded without the

other persons knowledge ha ha Tipsy you got

nailed in a lie, now do the crow eating shuffle

LOL

Instead of reaffirming the magnitude of your ignorance in redundant
posts, check the law,,I did. One thing I was wrong about, a judges
signature is NOT needed in Claifornia IF its in relation to law
enforcement when taping a conversation, but a private citizen may not do
so. You are now a felon for your acts of taping a party over the phone
lines (an interstate commerce, making it federal) without their implicit
permission. Better get educated before you wind up in prison. Ignorance
is no excuse for breaking the law.

Wrong again Tipsy no way you can spin your way out of this one I think
its time for you to eat the crow now LOL

From:
Wrong again Tipsy no way you can spin your

way out of this one I think its time for you to

eat the crow now LOL

Keep wishing and perhaps someone else besides myself shall take pity
upon you.
Go educate yourself. What you claimed you did (taping a private
conversation on the telephone without the other person's knowledge or
informing them you were taping) is a felony. Keep regurgitating your
learned ignorance..after all, it's your right to shout it to the world
day after day.